Epstein Secrets

the federal rules while at the same time asking this court to limit or prevent her deposition testimony as a witness in the instant matter or other Jane Doe matters where she has been identified as a witness. It is well settled that a Defendant may take the deposition of a party and/or a witness before

y take the deposition of a _s► and/or a witness before trial. Rule 26, Fed.R.Civ. P., Rule 30, Fed.R. Civ.,P. and Leve v. General Motors Corp., 43 F.R.D. 508 (S.D.N.Y. 2967). Jane Doe. Nos. 2 and 3 commenced separate civil actions upon the filing of same against Jeffrey Epstein. Therefore, Defendant is en

v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO_QUASH SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION OF JANE DOE NO.3, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and thro

take the deposition of a party and/or a witness before trial. Rule 26, Fed.R.Civ. P., Rule 30, Fed.R. Civ.,P. and Leve v. General Motors Corp., 43 F.R.D. 508 (S.D.N.Y. 2967). Jane Doe. Nos. 2 and 3 commenced separate civil actions upon the filing of same against Jeffrey Epstein. Therefore, Defendant is en

v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO_QUASH SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION OF JANE DOE NO.3, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and thro

take the deposition of a party and/or a witness before trial. Rule 26, Fed.R.Civ. P., Rule 30, Fed.R. Civ.,P. and Leve v. General Motors Corp., 43 F.R.D. 508 (S.D.N.Y. 2967). Jane Doe. Nos. 2 and 3 commenced separate civil actions upon the filing of same against Jeffrey Epstein. Therefore, Defendant is en

SLEY GROFF and Defendants. No. 17 Civ. 00616 (JGK) MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO LETTER MOTION TO OPPOSE ALTERNATIVE SERVICE ON MAXWELL Plaintiff, Jane Doe 43, by and through the undersigned counsel, now responds to the letter motion on behalf of non-party Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. ("Haddon Morga

ecognized, numerous courts have authorized alternative service even where the Hague Convention applies. See, e.g., Jian Zhang v. Baidu.com Inc., 293 F.R.D. 508, 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (citing Richmond Techs., Inc. v. Aumtech Bus. Solutions, No. 11—CV—02460-LHK, 2011 WL 2607158, at *12 (N.D. Cal. July 1, 2011)

v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO QUASH SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION OF JANE DOE NO.3, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY. AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and thro

take the deposition of a party and/or a witness before trial. Rule 26, Fed.R.Civ. P., Rule 30, Fed.R. Civ.,P. and Leve v. General Motors Corp., 43 F.R.D. 508 (S.D.N.Y. 2967). Jane Doe. Nos. 2 and 3 commenced separate civil actions upon the filing of same against Jeffrey Epstein. Therefore, Defendant is en