Epstein Secrets

DIVISION www.fisb.uscourts.gov IN RE: CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER 11 Debtor. INTERVENORS L.M., E.W.. AND JANE DOE'S LIST OF REOUESTED RELIEF SOUGHT IN THIS CASE Intervenors L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe" (hereinafter "the Victims"), proceeding pseudonymously, having

phone: (954) 315-1157 By: Is/ Peter E. Shapiro Peter E. Shapiro (FBN 615551) pshapiro @shapirolawpa.com Attorneys for Intervenors L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe 4 EFTA00808135 Case 09-34791-R BR Doc 6384 Filed 05/14/18 Page 5 of 6 SERVICE LIST Bradley J. Edwards FLBN 542075 Brittany N. Henderson FLBN 1

edies as the Court may find just and proper. CONCLUSION The Court should grant the three Victims' the relief requested above, including joinder in Farmer Jaffe's motion for sanctions and their own sanctions and other relief, for reasons as described in DE 6345 and DE 6357, as well as Farmer Jaffe's related pl

Link & Rockenbach reviewed were quite clearly not attorney-client privileged communications between Edwards and his three tort clients (M., E.W. or Jane Doe). Most significantly, numerous e-mails it reviewed were devastating to Edwards' case and contradicted both his sworn testimony and statements his co

tions filed in the Circuit Court. 14 EFTA00808717 C. Bankruptcy Court D.E. 6351 Date Document 04/09/18 Epstein's Response in Opposition to Farmer Jaffe's Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause, etc. Page 2 "The Court should not spend its valuable time and resources on this transparent and fri

Fowler White AKERMAN, LLP, by JOAN LEVIT, Esquire On behalf of Michael Goldberg PAUL G. CASSELL, Esquire (via telephone) On behalf of LM, EW and Jane Doe ALSO PRESENT EDWARD BRISCO ECRO - Electronic Court Reporting Operator OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS. INC. EFTA00787718 1 2 3 4 5 6

rs, which ended up with the order that we're talking about today. Another point of clarification, Mr. Scarola says that the order was entered over Farmer Jaffe's objection. He may have had some -- the law firm may have had some concerns, but it's very clear it's an agreed order. I don't know that that makes

rmer Jaffe Weissing. MR. CASSELL: Good morning, your Honor. This is Paul Cassell, C-a-s-s-e-1-1, appearing by phone for intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe. THE COURT: And, Ms. Henderson, you're representing who? MS. HENDERSON: Farmer Jaffe Weissing, your Honor. THE COURT: All right. Mr. McLachlan.

have knowledge of the custody of the disk, but there was no reference to production of documents, as was specifically requested in Mr. Edwards or Farmer Jaffe's motion. In addition, Judge, we believe that the scope of what Mr. Edwards is seeking is almost ridiculously overbroad. His request, essentially,

re at issue here. See DE 6351, p. 23. Accordingly, the request to intervene should be denied. To the extent this Court will consider L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe's Joinder in Motion for Order to Show Cause and Motion for Discovery, to Access Sanctions and Costs for Other Appropriate Relief (DE 6345), this resp

ONS AND COSTS, AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby responds to Farmer Jaffe's Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to

affe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Peter E. Shapiro Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Niall T. McLachlan Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. Isaac M. Marcushamer Counsel for Fowle

there had been a waiver of any privilege with regard to documents contained on the disc that permitted you to file documents that were included on Farmer Jaffe's privilege log. Ianno (Fowler White's counsel): And I want to add my objection that that has nothing whatsoever to do with the motion, the order or

S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (above for address purposes only) Attorney E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe 12 EFTA00795938

OSTS, AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF Bradley J. Edwards, through counsel, hereby files this Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition to Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Cost

f then-minor girls in his Palm Beach mansion in the Southern District of Florida and elsewhere. Several of these victims, including L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe," were represented by Farmer Jaffe attorney Bradley J. Edwards in their civil suits against Epstein. [DE 1120]. 2. Edwards filed the three sexual

Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Farmer Jaffe's Privilege Log. 23. On March 7, 2018, L.M. and two other minor girls Epstein had sexually abused, E.W. and Jane Doe, filed an emergency motion to i