Epstein Secrets

documents waived the privilege. § 90.507, Fla. Stat. (2006). Id. Notably, Edwards is already familiar with this basic principle. Specifically, in Jane Doe No. I v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014), it was Edwards who argued that the United States failed to confer with his clients before en

ed communication directly into the litigation, as necessary to prove an element of a claim or defense." Id. See also, e.g., GAB Bus. Sews., Inc. v. Syndicate 627, 809 F.2d 755 (11th Cir. 1987) ("If 627 introduces evidence as to the strength of JDA Farms' case-as 627 must to prevail—it cannot hide behind the s

Document 422 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2017 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR FINDING OF WAIVER OF WORK

vilege. The Government does not dispute that the same implicit waiver can be made of the attorney client privilege. See GAB Business Servs., Inc. v. Syndicate 627, 809 F.2d 755, 762 (11th Cir.1987) (discussing the implied waiver concept in the context of the attorney-client privilege). Indeed, the Government

Document 414 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF WAIVER OF WORK PRODUCT AND SIMILAR

hen considering any assertion of attorney-client privilege, which can likewise be explicitly or implicitly waived. See GAB Business Servs., Inc. v. Syndicate 627, 809 F.2d 755, 762 (11th Cir.1987) (discussing the concept in the context of the attorney-client privilege); Baratta v. Homeland Housewares, LLC, 24