Epstein Secrets

. ." DE 189 at 1. The Court went on to rule for the victims on the rescission issue, explaining that "in their petition and supplemental pleadings, Jane Doe 1 and 2 have identified a remedy which is likely to redress the injury complained of — the setting aside of the non-prosecution agreement as a prelude

t to add her as a party." DE 290 at 8. This unsupported allegation is simply false. See Aff. of Jane Doe No. 3 at 7, Exhibit 1 to Victims' Reply in Support of Motion for Joinder (hereinafter "Jane Doe No. 3 Aft") (responding to Government's claim of legal representation and attesting "[t]his is completely untrue, and I think

. ." DE 189 at 1. The Court went on to rule for the victims on the rescission issue, explaining that "in their petition and supplemental pleadings, Jane Doe 1 and 2 have identified a remedy which is likely to redress the injury complained of — the setting aside of the non-prosecution agreement as a prelude

t to add her as a party." DE 290 at 8. This unsupported allegation is simply false. See Aff. of Jane Doe No. 3 at 7, Exhibit 1 to Victims' Reply in Support of Motion for Joinder (hereinafter "Jane Doe No. 3 Aft") (responding to Government's claim of legal representation and attesting "[t]his is completely untrue, and I think

.." DE 189 at I. The Court went on to rule for the victims on the rescission issue, explaining that "in their petition and supplemental pleadings, Jane Doe 1 and 2 have identified a remedy which is likely to redress the injury complained of — the setting aside of the non-prosecution agreement as a prelude

t to add her as a party." DE 290 at 8. This unsupported allegation is simply false. See Aff. of Jane Doe No. 3 at 7, Exhibit 1 to Victims' Reply in Support of Motion for Joinder (hereinafter "Jane Doe No. 3 Aff.") (responding to Government's claim of legal representation and attesting "Mills is completely untrue, and I think