Epstein Secrets

RICO SPICIAL ONSVMER JUSTICE COVNSEt As per our discussion on September 251h followed by your e-mail and my e-mail, we are res • Jane Doe 101, Jane Doe 102 and all of your other clients, except for We have also agreed as part of the above settlement to certain additional terms, although it will not

RUDA DAVID A. YAREMA 'FLORIDA BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER 2ADMITTE Sent ACTICE IN EMICy. Aar, C/VIDRADO by E-Mail only BURMAN. CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN.LLP YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP October 19, 2009 Re: Settlement Negotiations Dear Bob: ADELOYI J. BENAVENTE PARALEGA

has met her burden, should the Court consider adopting such extraordinary relief. On its face, the motion does not meet the necessary burden as to Jane Doe 4, or Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, or 7. Discussion of Law Requiring the Denial of the Requested Protective Order Rule 26(c)(1XE), Fed.R.Civ P. (2009), gove

oma kmumo TO HACK= m Daum MID CCEDPA0O Sent by E.Mall and U.S, Mail Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. PA. Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 BURMAN. CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN.LLP YOUR. TRUSTED ADVOCATES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP August 27, 2009 Re: Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein Dear Stuart ADE/OWE BEPUNItin mmUGAVINv

has met her burden, should the Court consider adopting such extraordinary relief. On its face, the motion does not meet the necessary burden as to Jane Doe 4, or Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, or 7. Discussion of Law Requiring the Denial of the Requested Protective Order Rule 26(c)(1XE), Fed.R.Civ P. (2009), gove

efendant Jeffrey Epstein) 8 EFTA01625672 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 305-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2009 Page 1 of 1 BURMAN. CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN.LLP YOUR. TRUSTED ADVOCATES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP J. MICHAEL BURMAN. PA" GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA. ItOURT D. DUTTON. X. PA' SIMARD WEDEKEE.