Epstein Secrets

age 2 of 4 judicial notice of a similar motion and its attachments filed at Docket Entry 12 in the separate case filed in this court by the name of JANE DOE, a/k/a. JANE DOE NO. 1 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al. Case NO. 08-80804-CIV-MARRADOMISON 5. This evidence is relevant and critical to the prosecution of

litIci ' Employ...0 446 not atollabitilks .1 One I 449 Oillai CIO ROD fl 00 Moan. to Inn, ,,,,, to Ti 330 Om rol 1 333 an* Peachy 1 20 Monona A Gnu 1 1)0 Chi RION 1 553 Mon Cod Woo 11 /TO Tun (U.S. POOR or Daft04004) n 171 110-16011 Pony 26 USC' at 1 IMMmuTmN 1 40 NawiallotIo• A

led federal lawsuit last week, on behalf of the Jane Doe • 101 who allegedly visited Epstein a few times

s Months K. Administrative Sanction Date: S tvect Description CA! -* Type. Length p Suspenscn 0 Permanent Debarrnery. Or injancuon veer_ Monona_ I. Disruption/Dismantlement:  Oisrtption Date: Disniannement Date Cornrow cf FO-C15a rade 2 Mandatory P. Subject Information • Required for a

affirm the judgment of the District Court. John DOE # 1; Kelly Doe # 1, Parents of Jane Doe # 1, Individually and as Guardians on behalf of Minor Jane Doe # 1; John Doe # 2; Kelly Doe # 2, Parents of Jane Doe # 2, as Guardians on behalf of Minor Jane Doe # 2 I William Lawson CHAMBERLIN, Jr.; Kathr

ear Congressional manifestation of contrary intent, when a court construes a newly-enacted or revised statute, it presumes that Is the law is Monona with existing law. See Midlantic Na;'! Bank NJ. Dept of Envtl. Prot., 474 U.S. 494, 501, I S.Ct. 755, 88 L.Ed.2d 859 (1986) ("The normal rule o