Epstein Secrets

oquialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. C. "Plaintiff' means M. (I. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051XXXXMB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-80893-Marra/Johnson), and any other person who is or was represented by Rot

s H. Lichtman, Esq., Berger Singerman, P.A. 350 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 [ ] YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear in the United States Bankruptcy Court at the place, date and time specified below to testify in the above case. PLACE OF TESTIMONY COURTROOM DATE AND TIME [ X YOU ARE COMMANDED to a

ff/Comter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for M, E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for M, E.W. and Jane Doe 14

ers. Whether or not Fowler White and/or Epstein complied with that directive is squarely and appropriately before the court that issued the Order — the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. 2See March 8, 2018, Afternoon Hearing Transcript, 62:6-12 (Court allowed Epstein to file the exhibits under

in reliance on Edwards' previous waiver and agreement to produce the same, these e-mails must be deemed not protected by Edwards' clear waiver. See Jane Doe No. I v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014)(held that Epstein's former counsel had waived the work-product privilege with respect to docum

n exists because the Razorback victims were outspokenly not aligned with Edwards. This is perhaps best illustrated in the hearing transcript before the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-BKC- RBR, in In re Rothstein Rosenfeld! Adler, P.A., in which the following were statements made by