Epstein Secrets

in support thereof, states: INTRODUCTION Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), along with Fanner Jaffe and Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe (collectively, the "Bankruptcy Movants") have moved the Bankruptcy Court for an Order to show cause why a November 2010 Agreed Order' has not been

show cause proceedings and depositions, and in support thereof, states: INTRODUCTION Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), along with Fanner Jaffe and Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe (collectively, the "Bankruptcy Movants") have moved the Bankruptcy Court for an Order to show cause why a N

PA told Law360, "Mr. Epstein never even knew Fowler White had the disc until we found it." Counsel for three victims — identified as L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe — asked Judge Hafele to order Fowler White to explain its handling of the confidential documents, but he said he lacked the authority to do so sinc

er Jaffe Wcissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL said in its March 19 motion that recent developments in ongoing litigation between Epstein and former Fanner Jaffe partner Bradley J. Edwards, who represented several of Epstein's victims, showed that Fowler White retained a copy of the confidential documents and

e J. Segal, Esq. Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe EFTA00793678

PTER 11 Debtor. NOTICE OF JOINT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Movants, Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M., hereby voluntarily dismiss their respective Motion's for Contempt against Jeffrey

re at issue here. See DE 6351, p. 23. Accordingly, the request to intervene should be denied. To the extent this Court will consider L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe's Joinder in Motion for Order to Show Cause and Motion for Discovery, to Access Sanctions and Costs for Other Appropriate Relief (DE 6345), this resp

of the Amended Exhibit List in the state court in March 2018. There is not even an allegation that Fowler White used the documents on the disk which Fanner Jaffe claims to be privileged. The worst that can be said is that a CD sat unused in Fowler White's files. Farmer Jaffe and Bradley Edwards seek sanction

. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah (above for address purposes only) Attorney E-Mail: Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe EFTA00795926

Cause Hearing, as it is Edwards' position that only one (1) day is required. Edwards reasonably believes that this view is shared by, at a minimum, Fanner Jaffe and the Intervenors. Thus, rescheduling will conserve Court resources, as a single day should be sufficient. Conclusion Given the foregoing, Edwar

S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (above for address purposes only) Attorney E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe EFTA00795944

after "the Epstein lawsuit"). The result of that subpoena was the production from the RRA trustee of approximately 27,000 emails to be delivered to Fanner Jaffe for the review and creation of a privilege log. On November 30, 2010, this Court ordered Epstein to bear the costs of the printing and Bates Number

by-the ttemeyls-Offieer Mr. Edwards first saw a reference to the NPA on or after July 9, 2008, when the Government filed its responsive pleading to Jane Doe's emergency petition. That-pleading-was-the-first-publie mention-ef-the-neit-preseeution-agreement-and-the-fifst-diselesere-to-MirE4wards-(ead-thus-te

Stacey Swim best*. S filing a Lawsuit for Senually Assault by • Mange Therapist Mip Wans,pstMogette.conYtlogitaVI witSlifengakWwwl losiestraft Fanner Jaffe Weaning Ape 29 )ob us In wishing Farmer Jaffe WetsSing - Gary Farmer a Happy aftbdayl is Rae Sterner Moore Hey WI, bob Se a gixograpii Wry prote