Epstein Secrets

REPLY, the most recent of which center on the new nominee for Secretary of Labor, Alexander Acosta, who, when he was United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, approved Mr. Epstein's nonprosecution agreement. See, e.g., New York Daily News, "Labor Secretary nominee Alexander Acosta gave `sweethe

he party knows will assert his Fifth Amendment privilege, see, e.g., Brinks, Inc. v. City of New York, 717 F.2d 700, 708-10 (2d Cir. 1983); see also LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1997), neither is this Court required to permit it in all cases. Instead, the question must be evaluated on

United States District Court Southern District of New York Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. I PLAINTIFF REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO PRESENT TESTIMON

Deposit Co. of Maryland, 45 F.3d 969 (5th Cir. 1995) 6 In re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation, 2005 WL 375315 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2005) 17 LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1997) passim Rules Fed. R. Evid. 611(c) 16 ii EFTA00622177 Plaintiff respectfully submits her repl

to me that we're not going to complete a variety of discovery issues by July 1. The problem, I think, your Honor, is the cascading effect of that SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA_R1_00024109 EFTA01737513 3 G6ndgium 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

t would not justify a deposition, which leaves really the Fifth Amendment implications that have been represented will be made, and that raises the LiButti issue. And under LiButti, your Honor, really the permeating factor is control. And the typical case -- really, most of the cases, to the extent co