Epstein Secrets

; Jennifer Richardson Gary, We have received the below communication, and we will revert back as appropriate. thank you, Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York >; From: Gary Bloxsome Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2020 13:04 To: ; ) < >; Daniel Cundy ; Jennifer Richardson Subject: Re

resonates with the law as set out in United States v. Allen, 864 F.3d (2d Cir.2017). We also attach an extract from the publication `Montgomery and Ormerod on Fraud: Criminal Law and Procedure' (2008) which summarises the approach taken by the Serious Fraud Office (see A7-327) to the limitations and pro

took place outside of the period 1994 to 1997. Please let us know if our understanding is incorrect. Thank you, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 1:35 PM To: Gary Bloxsome Daniel Cundy Subject: RE:

resonates with the law as set out in United States v. Allen, 864 F.3d (2d Cir.2017). We also attach an extract from the publication 'Montgomery and Ormerod on Fraud: Criminal Law and Procedure' (2008) which summarises the approach taken by the Serious Fraud Office (see A7-327) to the limitations and pro

took place outside of the period 1994 to 1997. Please let us know if our understanding is incorrect. Thank you, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 20201:35 PM To: Gary Bloxsome Richardson Cc: (USANYS)

resonates with the law as set out in United States v. Allen, 864 F.3d (2d Cir.2017). We also attach an extract from the publication 'Montgomery and Ormerod on Fraud: Criminal Low and Procedure' (2008) which summarises the approach taken by the Serious Fraud Office (see A7-327) to the limitations and pro

er written questions relevant to the Maxwell indictment as an answer in the negative as to both questions. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York I St. Andrew's Plaza New York. NY 10007 From: Gary Bloxsome < Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 5:39 AM To: Cc: >; Daniel Cundy a;

resonates with the law as set out in United States v. Allen, 864 F.3d (2d Cir.2017). We also attach an extract from the publication 'Montgomery and Ormerod on Fraud: Criminal Low and Procedure' (2008) which summarises the approach taken by the Serious Fraud Office (see A7-327) to the limitations and pro

er written questions relevant to the Maxwell indictment as an answer in the negative as to both questions. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York I St. Andrew's Plaza ISM 10007 From: Gary Bloxsome Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 5:39 AM To: Cc: >; Daniel Cundy ; Jennifer R

resonates with the law as set out in United States v. Allen, 864 F.3d (2d Cir.2017). We also attach an extract from the publication 'Montgomery and Ormerod on Fraud: Criminal Law and Procedure' (2008) which summarises the approach taken by the Serious Fraud Office (see A7-327) to the limitations and pro

er written questions relevant to the Maxwell indictment as an answer in the negative as to both questions. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: Gary Bloxsome Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 5:39 AM To: Cc: Richardson (USANYS)

resonates with the law as set out in United States v. Allen, 864 F.3d (2d Cir.2017). We also attach an extract from the publication 'Montgomery and Ormerod on Fraud: Criminal Low and Procedure' (2008) which summarises the approach taken by the Serious Fraud EFTA00087837 Office (see A7-327) to the limi

ceived the below communication, and we will revert back as appropriate. thank you, ca ) <S; ; Daniel Cundy Jennifer > Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York From: Gary Bloxsome Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2020 13:04 To:I >, Daniel EFTA00096353 Cundy Jennifer Richardson ) Subject: Re:

the law as set out in United States v. Allen, 864 F.3d (2d Cir.2017). We also attach an extract from the publication EFTA00096355 'Montgomery and Ormerod on Fraud: Criminal Law and Procedure' (2008) which summarises the approach taken by the Serious Fraud Office (see A7-327) to the limitations and pro

er written questions relevant to the Maxwell indictment as an answer in the negative as to both questions. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York I St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: Gary Bloxsome Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 5:39 AM To: > Cc: I c: >• Daniel Cun

resonates with the law as set out in United States v. Allen, 864 F.3d (2d Cir.2017). We also attach an extract from the publication 'Montgomery and Ormerod on Fraud: Criminal Law and Procedure' (2008) which summarises the approach taken by the Serious Fraud Office (see A7-327) to the limitations and pro