Epstein Secrets

08-cv-80119-KAM Document 79 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2009 Page 7 of 7 Page 7 Respectfully sub By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Milit 4162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. ER & COLEMAN Phone Fax (Co-Couruel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) EFTA00722742 37 93dge 9:08-01301VRAIr•bocument 79-2 Entered on FLSD e

. As such, consolidation in the instant matter is not warranted in that not all common issues of fact are present and the parties are not identical. Kelly v. Kelly, 911 F.Supp. 66 (N.D. NY 1996Xconsolidation refused because it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share all

alm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jef•ey Epstein EFTA00729283 Page 7 Respectfully submitted, By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 BURMAN. CRITTON. LUTTIER & COLEMAN 5611515-3148 Fax (Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) EFTA00729284

. As such, consolidation in the instant matter is not warranted in that not all common issues of fact are present and the parties are not identical. Kelly v. Kelly, 911 F.Supp. 66 (N.D. NY 1996)(consolidation refused because it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share al

Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00729290 Page 7 Respectfully submitted, By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 Rillilliiii, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 3401 EFTA00729291

. As such, consolidation in the instant matter is not warranted in that not all common issues of fact are present and the parties are not identical. Kelly v. Kelly, 911 F.Supp. 66 (N.D. NY 1996)(consolidation refused because it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share al