Epstein Secrets

F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20 Am. Civil Liberties Union v. United States Dep't of, Del, 901 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2018) 5 Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) 7, 15, 16 Associate

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

of Homeland Sec., 243 F. Supp. 3d 393 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) 21 Albuquerque Publ'g Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 726 F. Supp. 851 (D.D.C. 1989) 21 Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't of Def., 543 F.3d 59 (2d Cir. 2008) 5 Assoc. Press v. U.S. Dep't of Defense, 554 F.3d 274 (2d Cir. 2009) 5 Associated Press v. U.S. De

0-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Filed 09/10/20 Page 16 of 29 interfere with enforcement proceedings. See 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A); NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 236 (1978); see also, e.g., Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) ("Affidavits must contain more than mere concl

F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20 Am. Civil Liberties Union v. United States Dep't of, Del, 901 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2018) 5 Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) 7, 15, 16 Associate

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

of Homeland Sec., 243 F. Supp. 3d 393 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) 21 Albuquerque Publ'g Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 726 F. Supp. 851 (D.D.C. 1989) 21 Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't of Def., 543 F.3d 59 (2d Cir. 2008) 5 Assoc. Press v. U.S. Dep't of Defense, 554 F.3d 274 (2d Cir. 2009) 5 Associated Press v. U.S. De

0-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Filed 09/10/20 Page 16 of 29 interfere with enforcement proceedings. See 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A); NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 236 (1978); see also, e.g., Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) ("Affidavits must contain more than mere concl

F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20 Am. Civil Liberties Union v. United States Dep't of, Del, 901 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2018) 5 Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) 7, 15, 16 Associate

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that