Epstein Secrets

Family Law Quarterly, 14(4), 411-425. Gillespie, A. (2004). "Grooming": Definitions and the law. New law Journal, 154(7124), 586-587. Grab, A. N., Hobson, W. F., & Gary, T. S. (1982). The child molester: Clinical obser- vations. In J. R. Conic & D. A. Shore (Eds.), Social work and child sexual abuse (

all d Sexual Abuse, 23:957-976, 2014 Copyright O Taylor & Francis Group, DA: ISSN: 1053-8712 print/1547-

ed from Steve Penny, who was CEO of USA Gymnastics when he delivered the information. He later resigned under pressure." The Washington Post (9/13, Hobson, 14.2M) reports, "Separately, the attorneys general in California and Indiana also have opened investigations into Olympic sports organizations that

additionally sentenced "to a year of supervised release, 250 hours of community service and a $30,000 fine." According to the New York Times (9/13, Taylor, 18.61M), "The judge's decision to impose a prison sentence on Ms. Huffman, whom prosecutors saw as one of the least culpable parents, made it more

onsideration and weighing."' Farmington Country Club v. Marshall, 47 Va. App. 15, 26, 622 S.E.2d 233, 239 (2005), quoting Hungerford Mech. Corp. v. Hobson, 11 Va. App. 675, 677, 401 S.E.2d 213, 215 (1991). p12] "The probative weight to be accorded medical evidence is for the Commission to decide; and

e ground that it does not truly express the intent of the parties." Dixon, Odom & Co. v. Sledge (1982), 59 N.C.App. 280, 284, 296 S.E.2d 512, citing Taylor v. Gibbs (1966), 268 N.C. 363, 150 S.E.2d 506. (P411 Here, section 5a. of the August 2001 agreement plainly and unambiguously discharges Jeepers'

to disguise what he is setting out to accomplish. In addition, it must be recognized that not all sexual offenders use grooming techniques. Groth, Hobson, and Gary (1982) differentiated between "child molesters" and "child rapists." Part of this distinction for these authors stems from their observat

ild Serial Abuse, 23:957-976, 2014 Copyright te) Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1053-8712 print/1547-

vance of the law. Id. at 524. Judge Vinson agreed with Reichhold that the privilege was necessary to protect an organization or individual from the Hobson's choice °feistier undertaking an aggressive investigation and correcting dangerous conditions, "thereby creating a self-incriminating record that m

)? the better reasoned conclusion is that Rule 612 does apply at depositions. 1. The Work Product Doctrine In the now famous case of Hickman 11. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 67 S.Ct. 385, 1 L.Ed. 451 (1947), the Supreme Court re- cognized the work product doctrine. The doctrine creates a "protected zone"

vance of the law. Id. at 524. Judge Vinson agreed with Reichhold that the privilege was necessary to protect an organization or individual from the Hobson's choice of either undertaking an aggressive investigation and correcting dangerous conditions, "thereby creating a self-incriminating record that m

trine applies to criminal litigation as well as civil, we find its protection unavailable in this case. Page 15 nized by this Court of Hickman /. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 67 S.Ct. 385, 91 .Ed. 451 (1947), reflects the strong 'public policy underlying the orderly prosecution *237 and defense of legal