Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Conzielle, 171 F.3d at 752 (citations omitted). The burden for proving both prongs of the standard rests squarely on the defendant. United States v. Scarpa, 913 F.3d 993, 1014 (2d Cir. 1990); United States v. Rubin, 609 F.2d 51, 66 (2d Cir. 1979); United States v. Ricco, 549 F.2d 264, 272 (2d Cir. 1977
e district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction.")); United States v. Salamelz, 152 F.3d 88, 120 (2d Cir. 1998). This Circuit "presumes a narrow reading of the boundaries of a plea agreement unless a defendant can affirmatively
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Conzielle, 171 F.3d at 752 (citations omitted). The burden for proving both prongs of the standard rests squarely on the defendant. United States v. Scarpa, 913 F.3d 993, 1014 (2d Cir. 1990); United States v. Rubin, 609 F.2d 51, 66 (2d Cir. 1979); United States v. Ricco, 549 F.2d 264, 272 (2d Cir. 1977
e district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction.")); United States v. Salamelz, 152 F.3d 88, 120 (2d Cir. 1998). This Circuit "presumes a narrow reading of the boundaries of a plea agreement unless a defendant can affirmatively
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Conzielle, 171 F.3d at 752 (citations omitted). The burden for proving both prongs of the standard rests squarely on the defendant. United States v. Scarpa, 913 F.3d 993, 1014 (2d Cir. 1990); United States v. Rubin, 609 F.2d 51, 66 (2d Cir. 1979); United States v. Ricco, 549 F.2d 264, 272 (2d Cir. 1977
e district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction.")); United States v. Salamelz, 152 F.3d 88, 120 (2d Cir. 1998). This Circuit "presumes a narrow reading of the boundaries of a plea agreement unless a defendant can affirmatively
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Cornielle, 171 F.3d at 752 (citations omitted). The burden for proving both prongs of the standard rests squarely on the defendant. United States v. Scarpa, 913 F.3d 993, 1014 (2d Cir. 1990); United States v. Rubin, 609 F.2d 51, 66 (2d Cir. 1979); United States v. 42 EFTA00103067 Ricco, 549 F.2d 264
e district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction.")); United States v. Salamelz, 152 F.3d 88, 120 (2d Cir. 1998). This Circuit "presumes a narrow reading of the boundaries of a plea agreement unless a defendant can affirmatively
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (397)
Entities connected to both Scarpa and Salamelz
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Scarpa·10 w/ Salamelz
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON16 w/ Scarpa·10 w/ Salamelz
United States
LOCATION15 w/ Scarpa·10 w/ Salamelz
the Southern District
LOCATION13 w/ Scarpa·10 w/ Salamelz
Julie K. Brown
PERSON14 w/ Scarpa·9 w/ Salamelz
Eric Schmidt
PERSON13 w/ Scarpa·9 w/ Salamelz
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Scarpa·9 w/ Salamelz
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Scarpa·10 w/ Salamelz
MA
Martindell
PERSON10 w/ Scarpa·9 w/ Salamelz
CA
Canfield
PERSON10 w/ Scarpa·9 w/ Salamelz
David Boies
PERSON10 w/ Scarpa·9 w/ Salamelz
Colorado
LOCATION14 w/ Scarpa·5 w/ Salamelz
FI
Fisher
PERSON10 w/ Scarpa·9 w/ Salamelz
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON10 w/ Scarpa·9 w/ Salamelz
Carpenter
PERSON10 w/ Scarpa·9 w/ Salamelz
North Carolina
LOCATION13 w/ Scarpa·5 w/ Salamelz
Michael Jackson
PERSON14 w/ Scarpa·4 w/ Salamelz
Andover Data Servs
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Scarpa·9 w/ Salamelz
WA
Walsh
PERSON13 w/ Scarpa·4 w/ Salamelz
SA
Salameh
PERSON7 w/ Scarpa·10 w/ Salamelz