Epstein Secrets

n G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MAMA02116 15 EFTA00058443 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 16 of 16 Marc Allan Fernich Law Office of Marc Fernich 810 Seventh Ave Suite 620 New York, NY 10019 16 EFTA00058444

conduct ending in 2005 that were neither admitted-to nor within the scope of Mr. Epstein's guilty plea. See People v. Epstein, 89 A.D. 3d 570, 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). While Mr. Epstein has made no subsequent attempt to challenge the continuing nature of his designation, his law-abiding behavior for th

rg, Los Angeles, CA, for Government. James L. Brochin, Michael Campion Miller, Michael Gerard Scavelli, Reid Weingarten, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Marc Allan Fernich, Law Office of Marc Fernich, New York, NY, Martin Gary Weinberg, Martin G. Weinberg, PC, Bos- ton, MA, for Defendant. DECISION & ORDER REMANDING

11, by a panel of five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. Peo- ple v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). Notwithstanding Judge Pickholz's order, according to a July 10, 2019 investigative report by the New York Post, as noted, Mr. Epstei

on, MA 02116 (617) 227-3700 Fax: (617) 338-9538 [email protected] 15 EFTA00076082 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 16 of 16 Marc Allan Fernich Law Office of Marc Fernich 810 Seventh Ave Suite 620 New York, NY 10019 (212) 446-2346 Fax: (212)446 2330 [email protected] 16 EFTA00076083

conduct ending in 2005 that were neither admitted-to nor within the scope of Mr. Epstein's guilty plea. See People v. Epstein, 89 A.D. 3d 570, 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). While Mr. Epstein has made no subsequent attempt to challenge the continuing nature of his designation, his law-abiding behavior for th

rg, Los Angeles, CA, for Government. James L. Brochin, Michael Campion Miller, Michael Gerard Scavelli, Reid Weingarten, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Marc Allan Fernich, Law Office of Marc Fernich, New York, NY, Martin Gary Weinberg, Martin G. Weinberg, PC, Bos- ton, MA, for Defendant. DECISION & ORDER REMANDING

11, by a panel of five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. Peo- ple v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). Notwithstanding Judge Pickholz's order, according to a July 10, 2019 investigative report by the New York Post, as noted, Mr. Epstei

or admission pro hac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 15 EFTA00095885 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 16 of 16 Marc Allan Fernich Law Office of Marc Fernich I I I I I 16 EFTA00095886 Case 1:19-Cr-00400-RMS Document 6-1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 1 of 15 EXHIBIT 1 EFTA00095887 C

conduct ending in 2005 that were neither admitted-to nor within the scope of Mr. Epstein's guilty plea. See People v. Epstein, 89 A.D. 3d 570, 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). While Mr. Epstein has made no subsequent attempt to challenge the continuing nature of his designation, his law-abiding behavior for th

in G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 15 EFTA00097474 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 16 of 16 Marc Allan Fernich Law Office of Marc Fernich 810 Seventh Ave Suite 620 New York, NY 10019 16 EFTA00097475

conduct ending in 2005 that were neither admitted-to nor within the scope of Mr. Epstein's guilty plea. See People v. Epstein, 89 A.D. 3d 570, 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). While Mr. Epstein has made no subsequent attempt to challenge the continuing nature of his designation, his law-abiding behavior for th