Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s "are violated only when the challenged conduct invaded his legitimate expectation of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Ame
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s "are violated only when the challenged conduct invaded his legitimate expectation of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Ame
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s "are violated only when the challenged conduct invaded his legitimate expectation of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Ame
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s "are violated only when the challenged conduct invaded his legitimate expectation of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Ame
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Payner and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Eric Schmidt
PERSON13 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON13 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON13 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
David Boies
PERSON13 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON13 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
MA
Martindell
PERSON12 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON12 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
the Southern District
LOCATION11 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION11 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
CA
Canfield
PERSON10 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
FI
Fisher
PERSON10 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
Carpenter
PERSON10 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
JP
Jeffrey Pagliuca
PERSON8 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
LP
Loretta A. Preska
PERSON8 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
Andover Data Servs
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Payner·3 w/ N.Y.
Stephen Hawking
PERSON8 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON8 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.
FA
Falso
PERSON8 w/ Payner·4 w/ N.Y.