Epstein Secrets

al Rule of Civil Procedure 7.3 does not require an unequivocal finding of manifest injustice before the Court may alter or amend a prior order. See Bostic v. AT&T of the Virgin Islands, 45 V.I. 553, 312 F.Supp.2d 731 M. 2004). "...[R]econsideration is the appropriate means of bringing to the court's

oregoing MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ECONSIDERATION OF ORDER ENTERED MAY 24, 2011 to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this r day of -1t.t , 2011. 41,01,4t4.14. 4/1A et kitr eck

al Rule of Civil Procedure 7.3 does not require an unequivocal finding of manifest injustice before the Court may alter or amend a prior order. See Bostic v. AT&T of the Virgin Islands, 45 V.I. 553, 312 F.Supp.2d 731 (D.C.V.I. 2004). "...[Rleconsideration is the appropriate means of bringing to the co

UM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S ORDER ENTERED ON MAY 24, 2011, to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this Is day of tin rI•P , 2011. ait,Cut 6 la& Anna ltftcCo

he just relief for all existing parties. A motion for reconsideration is not for raising matters that could have been raised before, but were not. Bostic v. AT&T of the Virgin Islands, 45 V.I. 553, 312 F. Stepp. 2d 731, 733 (D.V.L 2004). 13 EFTA00308336 V. CONCLUSION Manifest injustice will resul

and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Dated this S . th day ofJuly, 2011. Respectfully submitted, Treston . Moo V.I. B o. 10 MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, M. PHONE: FAX: EMAIL: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 5th day of July, 2011, a copy of the foregoing was served by first