Epstein Secrets

ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r

ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r

ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r