Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
must be served within 65 days' Comment pi: bail is rarely granted prior to the requested person's production in court and never in cases where the Crown Prosecution Service objects to bail Arrest pursuant to a full extradition request The requested person must be brought before the extradition judge "as soon as pract
ed value" when considering the facts of individual cases: Stehlins v Government of Latvia [2006] EWHC 1272 (Admin), para. 13. 67 Gomes para. 36 and Lisowski-v-Regional Court of Bialystock (Poland) [2006] EWHC 3227 (Admin), para. 9. 67 Gomes para. 36. " Woodcock v Government of New Zealand [2004] 1 WLR 47, para. 29; Gomes, para. 32; L
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
must be served within 65 days' Comment pi: bail is rarely granted prior to the requested person's production in court and never in cases where the Crown Prosecution Service objects to bail Arrest pursuant to a full extradition request The requested person must be brought before the extradition judge "as soon as pract
ed value" when considering the facts of individual cases: Stehlins v Government of Latvia [2006] EWHC 1272 (Admin), para. 13. 67 Gomes para. 36 and Lisowski-v-Regional Court of Bialystock (Poland) [2006] EWHC 3227 (Admin), para. 9. 67 Gomes para. 36. " Woodcock v Government of New Zealand [2004] 1 WLR 47, para. 29; Gomes, para. 32; L
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
must be served within 65 days' Comment pi: bail is rarely granted prior to the requested person's production in court and never in cases where the Crown Prosecution Service objects to bail Arrest pursuant to a full extradition request The requested person must be brought before the extradition judge "as soon as pract
ed value" when considering the facts of individual cases: Stehlins v Government of Latvia [2006] EWHC 1272 (Admin), para. 13. 67 Gomes para. 36 and Lisowski-v-Regional Court of Bialystock (Poland) [2006] EWHC 3227 (Admin), para. 9. 67 Gomes para. 36. " Woodcock v Government of New Zealand [2004] 1 WLR 47, para. 29; Gomes, para. 32; L
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (89)
Entities connected to both Crown Prosecution Service and Lisowski-v-Regional Court of Bialystock
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON5 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
United States
LOCATION5 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
Westminster Magistrates' Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
Southern District
LOCATION4 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
Michael Cohen
PERSON4 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
Crown
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
the House of Lords
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
Northern Ireland
LOCATION4 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
the International Criminal Court
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
Russia
LOCATION3 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
the Cayman Islands
LOCATION3 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
Guernsey
LOCATION3 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
London
LOCATION3 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
Henderson
LOCATION3 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
Christian R. Everdell
PERSON3 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
the Serious Fraud Office
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
MC
Mark S. Cohen
PERSON3 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
AD
Adeagbo
PERSON3 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional
KA
Kakis
PERSON3 w/ Crown·3 w/ Lisowski-v-Regional