Epstein Secrets

ment is dated as of January 1, 2004, but makes some reference to Highbridge sale, so we believe and Davis Polk confirms it was signed later (though Davis Polk could or would not say when). Advisory Agreement contains provisions similar to those provided in August 1, 2003 1 EFTA00722296 employment/trans

on the incentive fee portion of the fee). Agreement is dated as of January 1, 2004, but makes some reference to Highbridge sale, so we believe and Davis Polk confirms it was signed later (though Davis Polk could or would not say when). Advisory Agreement contains provisions similar to those provided in A

he Fund's Trading Manager, HCM (DSAM) will use reasonable efforts to provide and will cause Dubin to be reasonably available to market interests of the Zwirn Funds and to consult with Zwirn on investment strategies, to provide the Funds with administrative advice and assistance in connection with matters such

n that Zwirn had previously refused to give you an accounting even though you are a partner. Is this still true? At the January 22, 2009 meeting at Davis Polk, Kirkland tells me that they were provided only sketchy information as to a breakdown of the direct or indirect interests in the Funds' general par

n paid though my demand EFTA00729345 for payment has laid idle. Although we are told that the Highbridge account was to be run a like a mirror to the Zwirn Funds and that the investments were virtually the same, Highbridge monies began to be returned, the DSAM interests were reduced, and we are told that the

tion that Zwirn had previously refused to give you an accounting, though you are a partner. Is this still true. At the January 22, 2009 meeting at Davis Polk, we were provided only sketchy information as to a breakdown of the direct or indirect interests in the Funds' general partner and manager after Ma

nvested,and continued to be paid while my demand for payment lay idle. Although we are told the Highbridge account was to be run a like a mirror to the Zwirn Funds and the investments were virtually the same, Highbridge monies began to be returned, the Dubin and Sweica interests reduced, and EFTA00731084 aga

tion that Zwirn had previously refused to give you an accounting, though you are a partner. Is this still true. At the January 22, 2009 meeting at Davis Polk, we were provided only sketchy information as to a breakdown of the direct or indirect interests in the Funds' general partner and manager after Ma

nvested,and continued to be paid while my demand for payment lay idle. Although we are told the Highbridge account was to be run a like a mirror to the Zwirn Funds and the investments were virtually the same, Highbridge monies began to be returned, the Dubin and Sweica interests reduced, and EFTA00587573 aga