Epstein Secrets

ment is dated as of January 1, 2004, but makes some reference to Highbridge sale, so we believe and Davis Polk confirms it was signed later (though Davis Polk could or would not say when). Advisory Agreement contains provisions similar to those provided in August 1, 2003 1 EFTA00722296 employment/trans

on the incentive fee portion of the fee). Agreement is dated as of January 1, 2004, but makes some reference to Highbridge sale, so we believe and Davis Polk confirms it was signed later (though Davis Polk could or would not say when). Advisory Agreement contains provisions similar to those provided in A

um of the Fund. On page 14,"Although HCM (Highbridge Capital Management, LLC) is a Member of the Trading Manager, neither HCM nor Messrs. Dubin or Swieca have any authority or discretion over the operations or investments of the Trading Manager, the Fund, or the Non-U.S. Fund. Mr. Ziwrn has sole disc

rom September 06 through May 30, 2007 Carolyn Rubin works with SEC examiners to complete SEC Audit of HCM. In Rubin's complaint against HCM, Dubin, Swieca and others, Rubin alleges that "Rubin was not informed of internal meetings and meetings with outside counsel, discussions and internal preparation

tion that Zwirn had previously refused to give you an accounting, though you are a partner. Is this still true. At the January 22, 2009 meeting at Davis Polk, we were provided only sketchy information as to a breakdown of the direct or indirect interests in the Funds' general partner and manager after Ma

paid out under a separate agreement We understand that to date, all the monies owed to Dubin and Swieca have not been fully paid, so that Dubin and Swieca still retains an interest in the Zwirn business. • In October 2006, Zwirn called me to alert me to the fact he had terminated Perry Gruss as CFO

to be returned, the Dubin and Sweica interests reduced, and EFTA00731084 again we are told that an agreement was entered into that the Dubin and Swieca interests also be paid out under a separate agreement We understand that to date, all the monies owed to Dubin and Swieca have not been fully paid,

tion that Zwirn had previously refused to give you an accounting, though you are a partner. Is this still true. At the January 22, 2009 meeting at Davis Polk, we were provided only sketchy information as to a breakdown of the direct or indirect interests in the Funds' general partner and manager after Ma

paid out under a separate agreement We understand that to date, all the monies owed to Dubin and Swieca have not been fully paid, so that Dubin and Swieca still retains an interest in the Zwirn business. • In October 2006, Zwirn called me to alert me to the fact he had terminated Perry Gruss as CFO

to be returned, the Dubin and Sweica interests reduced, and EFTA00587573 again we are told that an agreement was entered into that the Dubin and Swieca interests also be paid out under a separate agreement We understand that to date, all the monies owed to Dubin and Swieca have not been fully paid,