Epstein Secrets

r but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. v. Manley, • Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(6); 2252A(a)(1) &

duction of Internet conversations as prejudicial. Appellate court affirmed — probative value outweighed prejudicial; sentenced 46 months & 3 years supervision & $500 fine. 2422(6) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 43 EFTA01729527 44 EFTA01729528 COURT . - ,-. r. ' , • •lc .f5 , , d • ',

r but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. v. Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(b); 2252A(a)(1) & (

uction of Internet conversations as prejudicial. Appellate court affirmed — probative value outweighed prejudicial; sentenced 46 months & 3 years supervision & $500 fine. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 43 EFTA00079456 COURT . ' C ES : i F - .• : FACTS COMMUNIC TION - ., U.S.

or but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S.'. Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(b); 2252A(a)(1) & (

uction of Internet conversations as prejudicial. Appellate court affirmed — probative value outweighed prejudicial; sentenced 46 months & 3 years supervision & $500 fine. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 47 EFTA00226349 COURT CASES' FACILITY -.. .FACTS/COa1UNICKITON CHARGE •; U.S. I