Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
1) 109, 113 viii EFTA00099949 Silver, 15 Cr. 93 (VEC) 275 Skelos, 15 Cr. 317 (KMW) 275 Smith y. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979) 117, 118 Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607 (2003) 45 Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 (1965) 300 Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975) 299,300 Taylor v. U
McCourty, 562 F.3d 458 (2d Cir. 2009) 260 xvii EFTA00099958 United States v. McDarrah, 351 F. App'x 558 (2d Cir. 2009) 257 United States v. Medina, No. 13 Cr. 272 (PGG), 2014 WL 3057917 (S.D.N.Y. July 7, 2014) 261 United States v. Miller, 116 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1997) 252, 292 United States
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
01) 109, 113 viii EFTA00077614 Silver, 15 Cr. 93 (VEC) 275 Skelos, 15 Cr. 317 (KMW) 275 Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979) 117, 118 Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607 (2003) 45 Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 (1965) 300 Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975) 299, 300 Taylor v.
McCourty, 562 F.3d 458 (2d Cir. 2009) 260 xvii EFTA00077623 United States v. McDarrah, 351 F. App'x 558 (2d Cir. 2009) 257 United States v. Medina, No. 13 Cr. 272 (PGG), 2014 WL 3057917 (S.D.N.Y. July 7, 2014) 261 United States v. Miller, 116 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1997) 252, 292 United States
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
01) 109, 113 viii EFTA00039429 Silver, 15 Cr. 93 (VEC) 275 Skelos, 15 Cr. 317 (KMW) 275 Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979) 117, 118 Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607 (2003) 45 Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 (1965) 300 Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975) 299, 300 Taylor v.
McCourty, 562 F.3d 458 (2d Cir. 2009) 260 xvii EFTA00039438 United States v. McDarrah, 351 F. App'x 558 (2d Cir. 2009) 257 United States v. Medina, No. 13 Cr. 272 (PGG), 2014 WL 3057917 (S.D.N.Y. July 7, 2014) 261 United States v. Miller, 116 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1997) 252, 292 United States
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
1) 109, 113 viii EFTA00103007 Silver, 15 Cr. 93 (VEC) 275 Skelos, 15 Cr. 317 (KMW) 275 Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979) 117, 118 Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607 (2003) 45 Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 (1965) 300 Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975) 299, 300 Taylor v.
McCourty, 562 F.3d 458 (2d Cir. 2009) 260 xvii EFTA00103016 United States v. McDarrah, 351 F. App'x 558 (2d Cir. 2009) 257 United States v. Medina, No. 13 Cr. 272 (PGG), 2014 WL 3057917 (S.D.N.Y. July 7, 2014) 261 United States v. Miller, 116 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1997) 252, 292 United States
2 mentions
Page EFTA00020275
ime-barred prosecution violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution, but a law that extends an un-expired statute of limitations does not. Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003). Senator Leahy, who co- sponsored the PROTECT Act, expressed concerns in a committee report that the propo
Page: EFTA00020275 →Page EFTA00020288
ephberg, courts in this Circuit have routinely denied pre-trial motions to dismiss potentially multiplicitous counts as premature." United States v. Medina, No. 13-cr-272 27 EFTA00020287 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 28 of 34 (PGG), 2014 WL 3057917, at *
Page: EFTA00020288 →2 mentions
Page EFTA00022105
ime-barred prosecution violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution, but a law that extends an un-expired statute of limitations does not. Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003). Senator Leahy, who co- sponsored the PROTECT Act, expressed concerns in a committee report that the propo
Page: EFTA00022105 →Page EFTA00022118
ephberg, courts in this Circuit have routinely denied pre-trial motions to dismiss potentially multiplicitous counts as premature." United States v. Medina, No. 13-cr-272 27 EFTA00022117 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 28 of 34 (PGG), 2014 WL 3057917, at *
Page: EFTA00022118 →Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00029554
ime-barred prosecution violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution, but a law that extends an un-expired statute of limitations does not. Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003). Senator Leahy, who co- sponsored the PROTECT Act, expressed concerns in a committee report that the propo
Page: EFTA00029554 →Page EFTA00029567
ephberg, courts in this Circuit have routinely denied pre-trial motions to dismiss potentially multiplicitous counts as premature." United States v. Medina, No. 13-cr-272 27 EFTA00029566 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 208 Filed 04/16/21 Page 28 of 34 (PGG), 2014 WL 3057917, at *
Page: EFTA00029567 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (452)
Entities connected to both Stogner and Medina
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON13 w/ Stogner·118 w/ Medina
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON7 w/ Stogner·68 w/ Medina
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Stogner·50 w/ Medina
United States
LOCATION13 w/ Stogner·39 w/ Medina
Prince Andrew
PERSON10 w/ Stogner·42 w/ Medina
George W. Bush
PERSON10 w/ Stogner·40 w/ Medina
the Southern District
LOCATION5 w/ Stogner·44 w/ Medina
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON10 w/ Stogner·39 w/ Medina
Julie K. Brown
PERSON4 w/ Stogner·43 w/ Medina
Bradley Edwards
PERSON5 w/ Stogner·39 w/ Medina
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Stogner·30 w/ Medina
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON6 w/ Stogner·36 w/ Medina
FBI
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Stogner·33 w/ Medina
LB
Leon Black
PERSON6 w/ Stogner·32 w/ Medina
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON7 w/ Stogner·31 w/ Medina
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON3 w/ Stogner·31 w/ Medina
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON9 w/ Stogner·24 w/ Medina
WE
Werner
PERSON7 w/ Stogner·26 w/ Medina
Alberto Gonzales
PERSON4 w/ Stogner·28 w/ Medina
WA
Walker
PERSON13 w/ Stogner·19 w/ Medina