Epstein Secrets

expertise to the offender. Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, Commentary (2006) at 4,1 5; see also People v. Ferrer, 69 M.3d 513, 514 (1st Dept. 2010) (observing "the risk level designated in the RAI is merely presumptive, and a court may depart from it as a matt

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

xpertise to the offender. Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, Commentary (2006) at 4, ¶ 5; see also People v. Ferrer, 69 A.D.3d 513, (1st Dept. 2010) (observing "the risk level designated in the RAI is merely presumptive, and a court may depart from it as a matte

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

xpertise to the offender. Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentaiy, Commentary (2006) at 4, ¶ 5; see also People v. Ferrer, 69 A.D.3d 513, 514 (1st Dept. 2010) (observing "the risk level designated in the RAI is merely presumptive, and a court may depart from it as a ma

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."