Epstein Secrets

he Office of Congressional Ethics reported that it found "a substantial reason to believe" that Collins violated federal law by touting the stock of Innate Immunotherapeutics, an Australian biotech firm, based on inside information. The office also said Collins may have broken House ethics rules by persuading National In

t embellishing it. He claimed on one of his websites to have had "the privilege of sponsoring many prominent scientists," including Mr. Pinker, Mr. Thome and the M.I.T. mathematician and geneticist Eric S. Lander. Mr. Pinker said he had never taken any financial or other support from Mr. Epstein. "Nee

he Office of Congressional Ethics reported that it found "a substantial reason to believe" that Collins violated federal law by touting the stock of Innate Immunotherapeutics, an Australian biotech firm, based on inside information. EFTA00085695 The office also said Collins may have broken House ethics rules by persuad

t embellishing it. He claimed on one of his websites to have had "the privilege of sponsoring many prominent scientists," including Mr. Pinker, Mr. Thome and the M.I.T. mathematician and geneticist Eric S. Lander. Mr. Pinker said he had never taken any financial or other support from Mr. Epstein. "Nee

t embellishing it. He claimed on one of his websites to have had "the privilege of sponsoring many prominent scientists," including Mr. Pinker, Mr. Thome and the M.I.T. mathematician and geneticist Eric S. Lander. Mr. Pinker said he had never taken any financial or other support from Mr. Epstein. "Nee

he Office of Congressional Ethics reported that it found "a substantial reason to believe" that Collins violated federal law by touting the stock of Innate Immunotherapeutics, an Australian biotech firm, based on inside information. The office also said Collins may have broken House ethics rules by persuading National In