4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
he USA and France: Lack of an absolute protection 23 Cass. Crim., 21 November 2007, No. 07-87540. 24 See by contrast, a 2016 recent decision of the Conseil dErat to deny extradition to Russia of a prominent figure of the Kazakh opposition, Moukhtar Abliazov, on the ground that the request was politicall
ary 2002). 4 The object of this agreement is "to provide for enhancements to cooperation in the context of applicable extradition relations between the Member States and the United States of America governing extradition of offenders" (Article I). The Instrument Amending the Treaty of April 23,1996 between the U
he USA and France: Lack of an absolute protection 23 Cass. Crim., 21 November 2007, No. 07-87540. 24 See by contrast, a 2016 recent decision of the Conseil dErat to deny extradition to Russia of a prominent figure of the Kazakh opposition, Moukhtar Abliazov, on the ground that the request was politicall
ary 2002). 4 The object of this agreement is "to provide for enhancements to cooperation in the context of applicable extradition relations between the Member States and the United States of America governing extradition of offenders" (Article I). The Instrument Amending the Treaty of April 23,1996 between the U
om and Hong Kong successfully challenged a decision from the French authorities not to extradite an individual whose extradition they had requested (Conseil d'Etat, 15 October1993, no. 142578). In the Peterson case, the American government did not 2 Circulaire Mandat d'arret europeen et Extradition n° C
rdance with the provisions of this Agreement, to provide for enhancements to cooperation in the context of applicable extradition relations between the Member States and the United States of America governing extradition of offenders". The existence of this Agreement would need to be taken into account by the Fr
om and Hong Kong successfully challenged a decision from the French authorities not to extradite an individual whose extradition they had requested (Conseil d'Etat, 15 October1993, no. 142578). In the Peterson case, the American government did not 2 Circulairc Mandat d'arret curopecn ct Extradition n° C
ce. It should be noted that the principle of non-extradition of nationals applies not only to the United States but also to all other States except the Member States of the European Union under the terms of the Law of March 9, 2004 transposing the framework decision of June 13, 2002 on the European arrest warran
Entities connected to both Conseil and the Member States

Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
United Kingdom
LOCATIONthe Requested State
LOCATION
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONWilliam JULIE
PERSON
Morocco
LOCATIONthe International Criminal Court
ORGANIZATION
Michael Cohen
PERSONCohen & Gresser LLP
ORGANIZATIONMark S. Cohen
PERSON
Eric Trump
PERSON
Ottawa
LOCATIONHans Peterson
PERSONMartin Weinberg
PERSONPeterson
PERSONRichard J. Durbin
PERSONthe French Ministry of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Barack Obama
PERSONthe French Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION