Epstein Secrets

nt resolution of controversies: and (5) the shared interest of the states in furthering fundamental social policies. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 292, 100 S. Ct. 559, 62 L. Ed. 2d 490 (1980). Georgia is the most convenient forum for plaintiff, who resided in Georgia during his

meaningful 'contacts, ties, or relations."' Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 471-72, 105 S. Ct. 2174, 85 L. Ed. 2d 528 (1985) (quoting International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 319, 66 S. Ct. 154, 90 L. Ed. 95 (1945)). Due process contemplates two types of personal jurisdiction: general jurisdi

ust be such that the defendant should be reasonably able to anticipate being haled into court in the forum state. See Worldwide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 297, 100 S.Ct. 559.62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980). 1. THIS COURT HAS PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER THE DEFENDANTS UNDER THE VIRGIN ISLANDS LONG-

of the Fourteenth Amendment's "minimum contacts" requirement. See In re Tutu Wells Contamination Litig., 846 F.Supp. 1243, 1264 (D.Vi.1993) (citing International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945)). When a defendant moves under Rule 12(b)(2) to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdict

st be such that the defendant should be reasonably able to anticipate being haled into court in the forum state. See World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 297 (1980). 1. This Court has Personal Jurisdiction over the Defendants under the Virgin Islands Long-Arm Statute The Virgin Isla

the Fourteenth Amendment's "minimum contacts" requirement. See In re Tutu Wells Contamination Litig., 846 F. Supp. 1243, 1264 (D.V.I. 1993) (citing International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945)). When a defendant moves under Rule 12(b)(2) to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, the plaintiff must m