Epstein Secrets

falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re Order, 632 F. Supp. 2d 202, 207 (E.D.N.Y. 2008); In re Application, 405 F. Supp. 2d 435, 444-45 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). But see In re Application, 849 F. Supp. 2d 526, 574 (D.Md. 2011) (rejecting

, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a); and perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623 (the "Subject Offenses"). 8. On June 29, 2020, a grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned an indictment charging GHISLAINE MAXWELL with the Subject Offenses. The Indictment charging MAXWELL is attached as Exhibit A hereto (the "

epresents GHISLAINE MAXWELL in civil litigation (the "Haddon, Morgan, & Foreman Phone"). The most recent contact between Target Cellphone-1 and the Haddon, Morgan, & Foreman Phone occurred in or about February 2020. d. Target Cellphone-1 has also been in contact with a phone subscribed to in the name of "Isabel Maxwell," whic

on and Pen Register Information APPLICATION Mag. The United States of America, by its attorney, Audrey Strauss, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel, respectfully requests that the Court issue the accompanying proposed Warrants and Orders for prospe

falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re Order, 632 F. Supp. 2d 202, 207 (E.D.N.Y. 2008); In re Application, 405 F. Supp. 2d 435, 444-45 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). But see In re Application, 849 F. Supp. 2d 526, 574 (D.Md. 2011) (rejecting

epresents GHISLAINE MAXWELL in civil litigation (the "Haddon, Morgan, & Foreman Phone"). The most recent contact between Target Cellphone-1 and the Haddon, Morgan, & Foreman Phone occurred in or about February 2020. d. Target Cellphone-1 has also been in contact with a phone subscribed to in the name of "Isabel Maxwell," whic

ed by counsel in multiple ongoing civil lawsuits in the United States. As recently as in or about June 2020, attorney Laura Menninger appeared in in the Southern District of New York for oral argument before United States District Judge Loretta A. Preska on MAXWELL's behalf. 13. Based on my review of AT&T records, I have learne

s GHISLAINE MAXWELL in civil litigation (the "Haddon, Morgan, & Foreman Phone"). The most recent contact between The Target Cellular Device and the Haddon, Morgan, & Foreman Phone occurred within the last 30 days. c. The Target Cellular Device has also been in contact with a phone subscribed to in the name of "Isabel Maxwell,

ew York, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the defendant, having taken an oath to testify truthfully in a deposition in connection with a case then pending before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under docket number 15 Civ. 7344, knowingly made false material declarations, to wit, MAXWELL gave the following underlined false testimony: Q.