Epstein Secrets

e 41. See 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(1)(A). I respectfully submit that the same probable cause supporting the Government's request for a warrant to obtain the Prospective Location Information requested above also supports the issuance of a warrant under § 2703(c) for the requested Historical Location Information. In addition, the Governm

ellphone in an Application and Agent Affidavit submitted on or about June 29, 2020.5 Also on or about June 29, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker granted the application and signed a Warrant and Order for the requested information. On June 30, 2020, the Government learned that the Agent Affid

e 41. See 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(1)(A). I respectfully submit that the same probable cause supporting the Government's request for a warrant to obtain the Prospective Location Information requested above also supports the issuance of a warrant under § 2703(c) for the requested Historical Location Information. In addition, the Governm

ellphone in an Application and Agent Affidavit submitted on or about June 29, 2020.5 Also on or about June 29, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker granted the application and signed a Warrant and Order for the requested information. On June 30, 2020, the Government learned that the Agent Affid

e 41. See 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(1)(A). I respectfully submit that the same probable cause supporting the Government's request for a warrant to obtain the Prospective Location Information requested above also supports the issuance of a warrant under § 2703(c) for the requested Historical Location Information. In addition, the Governm

ellphone in an Application and Agent Affidavit submitted on or about June 29, 2020.5 Also on or about June 29, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker granted the application and signed a Warrant and Order for the requested information. On June 30, 2020, the Government learned that the Agent Affid

rder — the same period of time for which a warrant for a tracking device may be granted under Rule 41(e)(2)(C). It bears noting, however, that while the Prospective Location Information may permit "tracking" the user of the phone in the colloquial sense, this is not an application for a warrant for a "tracking device" as defined in

pecified in the Application submitted in conjunction with this Affidavit. Sworn to before me this 29 day of June, 2020 eattamoli atc. HONORABLE KATHARINE H. PARKER United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of New York S I Special Agent Federal Bureau of Investigation Sworn to before me by reliable e

rder — the same period of time for which a warrant for a tracking device may be granted under Rule 41(e)(2)(C). It bears noting, however, that while the Prospective Location Information may permit "tracking" the user of the phone in the colloquial sense, this is not an application for a warrant for a "tracking device" as defined in

submitted in conjunction with this Affidavit. Special Agent Federal Bureau of Investigation Sworn to before me this day of June, 2020 HONORABLE KATHARINE H. PARKER United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of New York 8 2019.07.24 EFTA00016362 --- PAGE BREAK --- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTH

rder — the same period of time for which a warrant for a tracking device may be granted under Rule 41(e)(2)(C). It bears noting, however, that while the Prospective Location Information may permit "tracking" the user of the phone in the colloquial sense, this is not an application for a warrant for a "tracking device" as defined in

ellphone in an Application and Agent Affidavit submitted on or about June 29, 2020.5 Also on or about June 29, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker granted the application and signed a Warrant and Order for the requested information. On June 30, 2020, the Government learned that the Agent Affid