Epstein Secrets

rder — the same period of time for which a warrant for a tracking device may be granted under Rule 41(e)(2)(C). It bears noting, however, that while the Prospective Location Information may permit "tracking" the user of the phone in the colloquial sense, this is not an application for a warrant for a "tracking device" as defined in

falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re Order, 632 F. Supp. 2d 202, 207 (E.D.N.Y. 2008); In re Application, 405 F. Supp. 2d 435, 444-45 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). But see In re Application, 849 F. Supp. 2d 526, 574 (D.Md. 2011) (rejecting

, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a); and perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623 (the "Subject Offenses"). 8. On June 29, 2020, a grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned an indictment charging GHISLAINE MAXWELL with the Subject Offenses. The Indictment charging MAXWELL is attached as Exhibit A hereto (the "

on and Pen Register Information APPLICATION Mag. The United States of America, by its attorney, Audrey Strauss, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel, respectfully requests that the Court issue the accompanying proposed Warrants and Orders for prospe

rder — the same period of time for which a warrant for a tracking device may be granted under Rule 41(e)(2)(C). It bears noting, however, that while the Prospective Location Information may permit "tracking" the user of the phone in the colloquial sense, this is not an application for a warrant for a "tracking device" as defined in

falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re Order, 632 F. Supp. 2d 202, 207 (E.D.N.Y. 2008); In re Application, 405 F. Supp. 2d 435, 444-45 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). But see In re Application, 849 F. Supp. 2d 526, 574 (D.Md. 2011) (rejecting

or Cellphone Location and Pen Register Information The United States of America, by its attorney, Audrey Strauss, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel, respectfully requests that the Court issue the accompanying proposed Second Warrant and Order for p

rder — the same period of time for which a warrant for a tracking device may be granted under Rule 41(e)(2)(C). It bears noting, however, that while the Prospective Location Information may permit "tracking" the user of the phone in the colloquial sense, this is not an application for a warrant for a "tracking device" as defined in