Epstein Secrets

rder — the same period of time for which a warrant for a tracking device may be granted under Rule 41(e)(2)(C). It bears noting, however, that while the Prospective Location Information may permit "tracking" the user of the phone in the colloquial sense, this is not an application for a warrant for a "tracking device" as defined in

2006) (Kaplan, J.) (cellphone location information falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re Order, 632 F. Supp. 2d 202, 207 (E.D.N.Y. 2008); In re Application, 405 F. Supp. 2d 435, 444-45 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). But see In re Applicat

rder — the same period of time for which a warrant for a tracking device may be granted under Rule 41(e)(2)(C). It bears noting, however, that while the Prospective Location Information may permit "tracking" the user of the phone in the colloquial sense, this is not an application for a warrant for a "tracking device" as defined in

2006) (Kaplan, J.) (cellphone location information falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re Order, 632 F. Supp. 2d 202, 207 (E.D.N.Y. 2008); In re Application, 405 F. Supp. 2d 435, 444-45 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). But see In re Applicat

rder — the same period of time for which a warrant for a tracking device may be granted under Rule 41(e)(2)(C). It bears noting, however, that while the Prospective Location Information may permit "tracking" the user of the phone in the colloquial sense, this is not an application for a warrant for a "tracking device" as defined in

2006) (Kaplan, J.) (cellphone location information falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re Order, 632 F. Supp. 2d 202, 207 (E.D.N.Y. 2008); In re Application, 405 F. Supp. 2d 435, 444-45 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). But see In re Applicat