Epstein Secrets

ce even if Sentencing Guidelines were found unconstitutional. 42 EFTA00224176 COURT i .- FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION III CHARG.Elle U.S. I Pearl, Internet Internet chat room; conversations, 2252A; 324 F.3d 1210 (10" Cir. 2003) Sting email & telephone with "12 yr-old"; attempted to arran

or but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. I Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 1379982 (11th Cir. 2007) Slip Copy Not for Publication Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr

ffirmed but sentence vacated because court should have used downward departure. 2422(b); 2423(b) • Not Consummated Sting • lo1h Cir. U.S. v. Pearl, 324 F.3d 1210 (10'h Cir. 2003) • Internet Internet chat room; conversations, email & telephone with "12 yr-old"; attempted to arrange to have

r but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. v. Manley, • Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(6); 2252A(a)(1) &

tion affirmed but sentence vacated because court should have used downward departure. 2422(b); 2423(h) Not Consummated Sting 10'" Cir. U.S. v. Pearl, 324 F.3d 1210 (10ih Cir. 2003) Internet Internet chat room; conversations, email & telephone with "12 yr-old"; attempted to arrange to have se

r but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. v. Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(b); 2252A(a)(1) & (

b) & sentencing. Affirmed. 44 EFTA00226352 COURT. -- , ' • 44. ' FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION ' MMUN TION ,...-. .. . . taint U.S. I Pearl, Internet Internet chat room; conversations, 2252A; 324 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2003) Sting email & telephone with "12 yr-old"; attempted to arr

or but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S.'. Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(b); 2252A(a)(1) & (