Epstein Secrets

ed States v. Chimurenga, 760 F.2d 400, 403 (2d Cir. 1985). "[E]ven a single incident of witness tampering .. . [may be] sufficient to revoke bail." LaFontaine, 210 F.3d at 134. To order detention based upon risk of flight, the Court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that "that no conditions cou

rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [a victim's] father, forcing [him] off the road." [A, Dkt. 361-10; gee also gu➢ra p. 15. On September 16 EFTA00074005 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 17 of 33 19, 2007, Mr. Epstein's counsel proposed that M

ed States v. Chimurenga, 760 F.2d 400, 403 (2d Cir. 1985). "[E]ven a single incident of witness tampering .. . [may be] sufficient to revoke bail." LaFontaine, 210 F.3d at 134. To order detention based upon risk of flight, the Court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that "that no conditions cou

rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [a victim's] father, forcing [him] off the road." [A, Dkt. 361-10; gee also gu➢ra p. 15. On September 16 EFTA00074044 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 17 of 33 19, 2007, Mr. Epstein's counsel proposed that M

ed States v. Chimurenga, 760 F.2d 400, 403 (2d Cir. 1985). "[E]ven a single incident of witness tampering .. . [may be] sufficient to revoke bail." LaFontaine, 210 F.3d at 134. To order detention based upon risk of flight, the Court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that "that no conditions cou

rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [a victim's] father, forcing [him] off the road." [A, Dkt. 361-10; gee also gu➢ra p. 15. On September 16 EFTA00081962 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 17 of 33 19, 2007, Mr. Epstein's counsel proposed that M