Epstein Secrets

nd withholding of the Returned Records have not substantially changed the legal issues to be resolved by the Court. The Supplemental Declaration of Nicole McFarland and the Supplemental Declaration of Kara Christenson also correct and clarify certain information discovered or determined since the Government's A

C. Cir. 1998) 13 Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia Univ. v. U. S. Dep't of Homeland Security, 407 F. Supp. 3d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 19 Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 10-6078-TC, 2011 WL 2619538 (D. Or. July 1, 2011) 19 N.L.R.B v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978

't of Justice, 726 F. Supp. 851 (D.D.C. 1989), rejected general descriptions of wiretapping and related surveillance methods as too publicly known. Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 10-6078- TC, 2011 WL 2619538 (D. Or. July 1, 2011), rejected the withholding of a video of a prison riot and dis

l (`OIG') on or about August 22, 2019," and therefore "the BOP is no longer in possession of the log books" (Christenson Decl. 1 13; Declaration of Nicole McFarland, ECF No. 23 [hereinafter "McFarland Decl."], at ¶ 8). But, as BOP concedes, BOP received a FOIA request from The Times on August 13, 2019, seeking

mmerce, 375 F. Supp. 3d 93 (D.D.C. 2019) 20 Knight First Amendment Inst. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 407 F. Supp. 3d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 21 Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71300 (D. Or. July 1, 2011) 21 Lawyers Conun. for Human Rights v. INS, 721 F. Supp. 552 (S.

1989) (rejecting the government's invocation of Exemption 7(E) where there was "nothing exceptional or secret about the techniques it described"); Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71300, at *34 (D. Or. July 1, 2011) (holding that tactical maneuvers used during prison riots

nd withholding of the Returned Records have not substantially changed the legal issues to be resolved by the Court. The Supplemental Declaration of Nicole McFarland and the Supplemental Declaration of Kara Christenson also correct and clarify certain information discovered or determined since the Government's A

C. Cir. 1998) 13 Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia Univ. v. U. S. Dep't of Homeland Security, 407 F. Supp. 3d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 19 Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 10-6078-TC, 2011 WL 2619538 (D. Or. July 1, 2011) 19 N.L.R.B v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978

't of Justice, 726 F. Supp. 851 (D.D.C. 1989), rejected general descriptions of wiretapping and related surveillance methods as too publicly known. Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 10-6078- TC, 2011 WL 2619538 (D. Or. July 1, 2011), rejected the withholding of a video of a prison riot and dis

l (`OIG') on or about August 22, 2019," and therefore "the BOP is no longer in possession of the log books" (Christenson Decl. 1 13; Declaration of Nicole McFarland, ECF No. 23 [hereinafter "McFarland Decl."], at ¶ 8). But, as BOP concedes, BOP received a FOIA request from The Times on August 13, 2019, seeking

mmerce, 375 F. Supp. 3d 93 (D.D.C. 2019) 20 Knight First Amendment Inst. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 407 F. Supp. 3d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 21 Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71300 (D. Or. July 1, 2011) 21 Lawyers Conun. for Human Rights v. INS, 721 F. Supp. 552 (S.

1989) (rejecting the government's invocation of Exemption 7(E) where there was "nothing exceptional or secret about the techniques it described"); Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71300, at *34 (D. Or. July 1, 2011) (holding that tactical maneuvers used during prison riots