Epstein Secrets

for his helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article. Correspondence concerning this snide should be addressed to either Ronald P. Faber, Department of Psychology. Florida International Uni- versitg North Miami, Florida 33181, or R. Edward Geiselman, Depart- ment of INsystsulugy, University of California, Los A

iselman, Fishes Cohen, et al., 1986). We then refined the technique on the basis of insights gained from analyzing tape-recorded field interviews2 (Fisher, Geiselman, & Raymond, 1987). In the revised version, which was evaluated in the present study. we approached the eyewitness's problem from the fo

call in a court of law. In response to the need to improve police interview tech- niques and to avoid the legal problems of hypnosis, Geiselman and Fisher (Geiselman, Fisher, Cohen, Holland, & Suites, 1986; Geiselman, Fisher, Firstenberg, Hutton, Sullivan, Avetissian, & Prosk, 1984; Geiselman, Fisher,

Noble Savages: My Life Among Two Dangerous Tribes—the Yanomamo and the Anthropologists. STEVEN PINKER, psychologist, is Johnstone Family Professor, Department of Psychology; Harvard University; Author, The Better Angles of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined; The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. RICHA

ew friends and colleagues, Chagnon studied the up-to-date literature on natural selection theory, and with brilliant success he applied the ideas of Fisher, Hamilton, Trivers and other heirs of Darwin to a human tribe which probably ran as close to the cutting edge of natural selection as any in the wor

Goldfarb', Gail. S. Goodman2, Rakel P. Larson3, Mitchell L. Eisen', and Jianjian Qins oen:Lament of Psychology, Florida International university: 'Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis. 'Department of Psychology, Pities College. 'Department of Psychology, California State University, Las Angeles; a

rence in Time 2 report of adult sexual assault between those who had experienced child sexual abuse as of Time 1(19%) and those who had not (10%), Fisher's Exact Test, p = 0.285, ns. Time 2 participants Os = 30) were not significantly different from Time 1 participants who did not take part in the T