Epstein Secrets

nal Intelligence, No. 16-2517 (CKK), 2020 WL 805380 (D.D.C. Feb. 18, 2020) 15 Maynard v. C.I.A., 986 F.2d 547 (1st Cir. 19 93) 5, 6 N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1 978) 7, 8, 12 N.Y. Times v. Dep of Justice, 872 F. Supp. 2d 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) 5 NAACP Legal Dtf & Educ. Fund, Inc. v. U.S. D

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

Raza v. Dep't ofJustice, 411 F.3d 350 (2d Cir. 2005) 6 iv EFTA00071627 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Filed 09/10/20 Page 5 of 29 NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 227 (1978) 9, 10 NRDC v. EPA, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124353 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2019) 20 Pratt v. Webster, 673 F.2d 408 (D.C. Cir

0-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Filed 09/10/20 Page 16 of 29 interfere with enforcement proceedings. See 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A); NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 236 (1978); see also, e.g., Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) ("Affidavits must contain more than mere concl

nal Intelligence, No. 16-2517 (CKK), 2020 WL 805380 (D.D.C. Feb. 18, 2020) 15 Maynard v. C.I.A., 986 F.2d 547 (1st Cir. 19 93) 5, 6 N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1 978) 7, 8, 12 N.Y. Times v. Dep of Justice, 872 F. Supp. 2d 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) 5 NAACP Legal Dtf & Educ. Fund, Inc. v. U.S. D

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

Raza v. Dep't ofJustice, 411 F.3d 350 (2d Cir. 2005) 6 iv EFTA00088704 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Filed 09/10/20 Page 5 of 29 NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 227 (1978) 9, 10 NRDC v. EPA, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124353 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2019) 20 Pratt v. Webster, 673 F.2d 408 (D.C. Cir

0-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Filed 09/10/20 Page 16 of 29 interfere with enforcement proceedings. See 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A); NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 236 (1978); see also, e.g., Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) ("Affidavits must contain more than mere concl

nal Intelligence, No. 16-2517 (CKK), 2020 WL 805380 (D.D.C. Feb. 18, 2020) 15 Maynard v. C.I.A., 986 F.2d 547 (1st Cir. 19 93) 5, 6 N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1 978) 7, 8, 12 N.Y. Times v. Dep of Justice, 872 F. Supp. 2d 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) 5 NAACP Legal Dtf & Educ. Fund, Inc. v. U.S. D

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that