Epstein Secrets

-8619-... 4/10/2008 EFTA00191689 Page 1 of 10 w estlaw 761 F.2d 52 761 F.2d 52 (Cite as: 761 F.2d 52) H U.S. II. Zannino C.A. (Mass.),1985. United States Court of Appeals,First Cir- cuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Ilario M.A. ZANNINO, Defendant, Ap- pellee. No. 85-1070. Argued March 8, 19

i es of perjury. and which he does not to be true and correct as to every matenal ratter; or • teLa3 letter from the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama acknowl- edging that Harvey had reached an agree ment with the government in 1980. The government denied that Harvey had been granted any immunity

ppellees, U STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants, Ken Ault, Defendant—Appellant. No. 81-5122 Non—Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals. Eleventh Circuit. April 14, 1989. Keith C. Tischler, Parker, Skelding, Cos- tigan, McVey & Labasky, Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

lved in the negotia- tions rebutted Harvey's broad interpreta- tion of the agreement. In response to a question by the court, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama, Wil- liam Kimbrough, testified that Harvey was 3. I emphasize this point because the majority suggests. supra at 1442-1443, that the only prob. l

ly, the judgments are AF- FIRMED. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar de J. TOBON-BUILES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 82-5490. United States Court of Appeals. Eleventh Circuit. June 6, 1983. Rehearing En Banc Denied Sept. 13, 1983. Defendant was convicted before the United States District Court for th

l rights action challenging the at-large system of electing school commissioners in Mobile County, Ala- bama. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, Pitt- man, Chief Judge, 428 F.Supp. 1123, en- tered judgment for plaintiffs, and an appeal was taken. The Court of Appeals, 575 F.2d 298, affirmed