10
Shared Docs
10
Same-Page
10 / 10
Mentions
Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to fac
Oak t.8 6„,.../ 644,A dis # nIsstOe-f-e5 0021 hile,M-on Ctere# .fort ?en. 161/ wood Fe S3020 ftCheck Cann)' Mx re Action Most 7 MIAMI. DADE 3 MONROE 3 Snow Amu "(PALM BEACH 7 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 3 OKEECHOBEE NIG HE ANDS JULY 7, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMOIM CLERK U.S• DIST. C7- S.
Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to fac
IN LAND ( UNDEMNATION CASES. USE THE LOCATION OF THE TR ACT LAND INVOLVED. Attalnn,c or IV an. la 111Ched County Where Action Amex 3MI.MI.DADE 3 MONROE 3 BM/MARV ,'PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 3 OKEECHOBEE It ANDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION Mate .. - X- 'cum Bon Oath S Lei
Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to fac
NLY) NOTE: IN LAND ( ONDEMNATION CASES. USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT LAND INVOLVED. K.5 CtnyS IIICheck County Where Action Arose MIAMI-DADS 3 MONROE 3 EIROW MID /PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 3 OKEECHOBEE 1110111 SN1DS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION derma -a- Leon Ben usio S (
Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to fac
NDEMNATION CASES. USE THE LOCATION OF THE TR %CT LAND INVOLVED. MIOITICyS Of Keene „ / / hian/n A n -t• C C. I,- /la 4-74 g aflyS es4te 3 MONROE 3 BROW AR D /PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 3 OKEECHOBEE 1110111. SUDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION taw/ sa• x - taw, &wow S Co
Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to fac
NDEMNATION CASES. USE THE LOCATION OF THE TR %CT LAND INVOLVED. MIOITICyS Of Keene „ / / hian/n A n -t• C C. I,- /la 4-74 g aflyS es4te 3 MONROE 3 BROW AR D /PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 3 OKEECHOBEE 1110111. SUDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION taw/ sa• x - taw, &wow S Co
Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to fac
NDEMNATION CASES. USE THE LOCATION OF THE TR %CT LAND INVOLVED. MIOITICyS Of Keene „ / / hian/n A n -t• C C. I,- /la 4-74 g aflyS es4te 3 MONROE 3 BROW AR D /PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 3 OKEECHOBEE 1110111. SUDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION taw/ sa• x - taw, &wow S Co
Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to fac
D UN DINNATIUN CAM. UR TNT LOCATION Of IRE lint I LAND 17w0L al% g$ aflyi wo. ,F4 1 0 e /te (I) Chock County When Attica Arose 3 MIAMI. DADE 3 MONROE 3 DROWARD Arabi SCACN 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCC 7 INDIAN *MR 3 otucuoerr Hium...xos II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION trinetorx- n nee see oa& 3 I CS.40‘41140
Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership'. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to faci
f 624.41,es d'ssooirtes tor S Ahn45-an Cfere-e .51./Cre 202. /41/ 400 0 • 1 Fe 33 O2O I V Check Carney Where AC0011 Arose 7 MIAMI. DADE 3 MONROE 3 BROWARD XPALM MACH DEFENDANTS Pt/ / resat 54 "t e c CFI klelry cl aD ) D.C. JULY 7, 2008 STEVEN M. 1. ARIMORE CLERK U.S. 01ST. CT. S.O.
Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to fac
&rod oiPet 64sader is-ntsso6e-t-es ens Ahr,4.5-0,/ Stere-t4 .svire 202. AV/ Avg) )CC 55°Z° III Cheek County Where Action Arcox 3 m mgt. gin or 3 MONROE 3 BROW ARD JULY 7, 2008 STEVEN M. LARINORE CLERK US. 0IST. CT. S.D. OF FLA. • MIAMI Canny of Residence of First Listed Defendant ON L .S. PLAI
Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to facil
I ti e .:( 4 dpi ji 6,04.4G1 4. 1.c #/~sscl,a *5 zein hilre.rson . Ad" 702. Afa &Ant Fe g3OZO t fl ak Couniy Mime Anion Arm 7 MIAMI. DAK 7 MONROE 7 BROW ARD X•ALM 11EACN 7 MARTIN 7 ST. RULTE 7 INDIAN RIVER 7 OKECCIIUP(E JULY 7, 2008 STEVEN M. RARIMORE CLERK U.S. ITIST, CT. S. 0. Of FLA
Entities connected to both Elliott Industries Ltd. and MONROE

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATIONOKEECHOBEE
LOCATION
STEVEN M. LARIMORE
PERSON
Harvey Weinstein
PERSONBP America Production Co.
ORGANIZATIONPatkar
PERSON
Kenna
PERSONPetition
ORGANIZATIONNinth Circuit
ORGANIZATION
United States
LOCATIONFLSD Docket
ORGANIZATION
George W. Bush
PERSONthe U.S. Civil Statute
ORGANIZATION
D. Haw
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONINDIAN RIVER
LOCATION