Back to Network
9
Shared Docs
9
Same-Page
9 / 9
Mentions
Document Mentions (9 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the defendant should be housed where he can be secured at all times: a federal correctional center. The defendant faces a presumption of detention, Pretrial Services has recommended detention, and victims of the defendant seek his detention. Because there are no set of conditions short of incarceration that can
of flight must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 823 F.2d 4, 5 (2d Cir. 1987); United States v. Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d 400, 405 (2d Cir. 1985). A finding of dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferran
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the defendant should be housed where he can be secured at all times: a federal correctional center. The defendant faces a presumption of detention, Pretrial Services has recommended detention, and victims of the defendant seek his detention. Because there are no set of conditions short of incarceration that can
of flight must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 823 F.2d 4, 5 (2d Cir. 1987); United States v. Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d 400, 405 (2d Cir. 1985). A finding of dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferran
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the defendant should be housed where he can be secured at all times: a federal correctional center. The defendant faces a presumption of detention, Pretrial Services has recommended detention, and victims of the defendant seek his detention. Because there are no set of conditions short of incarceration that can
of flight must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 823 F.2d 4, 5 (2d Cir. 1987); United States v. Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d 400, 405 (2d Cir. 1985). A finding of dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferran
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the defendant should be housed where he can be secured at all times: a federal correctional center. The defendant faces a presumption of detention, Pretrial Services has recommended detention, and victims of the defendant seek his detention. Because there are no set of conditions short of incarceration that can
of flight must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 823 F.2d 4, 5 (2d Cir. 1987); United States v. Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d 400, 405 (2d Cir. 1985). A finding of dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferran
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the defendant should be housed where he can be secured at all times: a federal correctional center. The defendant faces a presumption of detention, Pretrial Services has recommended detention, and victims of the defendant seek his detention. Because there are no set of conditions short of incarceration that can
of flight must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 823 F.2d 4, 5 (2d Cir. 1987); United States v. Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d 400, 405 (2d Cir. 1985). A finding of dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferran
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the defendant should be housed where he can be secured at all times: a federal correctional center. The defendant faces a presumption of detention, Pretrial Services has recommended detention, and victims of the defendant seek his detention. Because there are no set of conditions short of incarceration that can
of flight must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 823 F.2d 4, 5 (2d Cir. 1987); United States v. Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d 400, 405 (2d Cir. 1985). A finding of dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferran
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the defendant should be housed where he can be secured at all times: a federal correctional center. The defendant faces a presumption of detention, Pretrial Services has recommended detention, and victims of the defendant seek his detention. Because there are no set of conditions short of incarceration that can
of flight must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 823 F.2d 4, 5 (2d Cir. 1987); United States v. Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d 400, 405 (2d Cir. 1985). A finding of dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferran
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the defendant should be housed where he can be secured at all times: a federal correctional center. The defendant faces a presumption of detention, Pretrial Services has recommended detention, and victims of the defendant seek his detention. Because there are no set of conditions short of incarceration that can
of flight must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 823 F.2d 4, 5 (2d Cir. 1987); United States v. Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d 400, 405 (2d Cir. 1985). A finding of dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferran
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the defendant should be housed where he can be secured at all times: a federal correctional center. The defendant faces a presumption of detention, Pretrial Services has recommended detention, and victims of the defendant seek his detention. Because there are no set of conditions short of incarceration that can
of flight must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 823 F.2d 4, 5 (2d Cir. 1987); United States v. Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d 400, 405 (2d Cir. 1985). A finding of dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferran
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (95)
Entities connected to both Pretrial Services and Chinmrenga
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON59 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
United States
LOCATION46 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
Michael Cohen
PERSON45 w/ Pretrial·9 w/ Chinmrenga
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON42 w/ Pretrial·9 w/ Chinmrenga
the Southern District
LOCATION26 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON25 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION23 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
Harry Reid
PERSON23 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
Michael Jackson
PERSON21 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
Reid Weingarten
PERSON20 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
Richard M. Berman
PERSON18 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION18 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
BO
Boustani
PERSON23 w/ Pretrial·9 w/ Chinmrenga
FBI
ORGANIZATION22 w/ Pretrial·9 w/ Chinmrenga
PI
Pitman
PERSON16 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSON22 w/ Pretrial·9 w/ Chinmrenga
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION15 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
Anderson
PERSON14 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
AN
Annabi
PERSON14 w/ Pretrial·15 w/ Chinmrenga
Prince Andrew
PERSON15 w/ Pretrial·14 w/ Chinmrenga