Epstein Secrets

scripts as a carrot, then suppression would be warranted on that basis alone. Cf. Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 (1978); United States v. Rajaratnani, 719 F.3d 139, 146 (2d Cir. 2013) ("Franks instructs a district court to hold a hearing to determine whether the alleged misstatements or omissions

20 F.2d 565 (2d Cir. 1987) 16 Young v. United States, 481 U.S. 787 (1987) 16 ii EFTA00086660 Other Authorities Norman Mailer, "An Appeal to Lillian Hellman and Mary McCarthy," 5/11/80 New York Times 2 Stephen Rex Brown, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine M

1987) 16 Young v. United States, 481 U.S. 787 (1987) 16 ii EFTA00011454 --- PAGE BREAK --- Other Authorities Norman Mailer, "An Appeal to Lillian Hellman and Mary McCarthy," 5/11/80 New York Times 2 Stephen Rex Brown, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine M

scripts as a carrot, then suppression would be warranted on that basis alone. Cf. Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 (1978); United States v. Rajaratnani, 719 F.3d 139, 146 (2d Cir. 2013) ("Franks instructs a district court to hold a hearing to determine whether the alleged misstatements or omissions

, did Boies Schiller have any role instigating the Maxwell inquiry. EFTA00029082 --- PAGE BREAK --- To paraphrase Mary McCarthy's philippic about Lillian Hellman, every word of the government's representation was untrue, "including 'and' and `the." The government knew what was in the Boies Schiller file; the

scripts as a carrot, then suppression would be warranted on that basis alone. Cf. Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 (1978); United States v. Rajaratnani, 719 F.3d 139, 146 (2d Cir. 2013) ("Franks instructs a district court to hold a hearing to determine whether the alleged misstatements or omissions

, did Boies Schiller have any role instigating the Maxwell inquiry. EFTA00029821 --- PAGE BREAK --- To paraphrase Mary McCarthy's philippic about Lillian Hellman, every word of the government's representation was untrue, "including 'and' and `the."' The government knew what was in the Boies Schiller file; th

scripts as a carrot, then suppression would be warranted on that basis alone. Cf. Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 (1978); United States v. Rajaratnani, 719 F.3d 139, 146 (2d Cir. 2013) ("Franks instructs a district court to hold a hearing to determine whether the alleged misstatements or omissions