Epstein Secrets

iminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. www.sec.gov MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my extensive

iminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. www.sec.gov MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my extensive

iminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

orth in Row S of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? EFTA00083136

tion. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before EFTA00067737 the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. viww. sec .g ov MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my extensive

tion. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before EFTA00076867 the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

w 5 of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. iww. sec MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my extensive

iminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. www.sec.gov MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my extensive

tion. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before EFTA00069027 the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

orth in Row 5 of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my extensive

iminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. www.sec.gov MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my extensive

iminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. www.sec.gov MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my extensive

iminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. www.sec.gov MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my extensive