Epstein Secrets

makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

of Little Dick Handler/JEF for 7 years now. Mr Handler/ JEF should have been prosecuted by the same entities now prosecuting Mr Kamensky LONG ago. Cheers! Christopher J Dilorio Whistleblower From: Chris Dilorio < E > Sent: Tuesday. June 23. 2020 9:48 AM Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for prel

on of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY EFTA00039669 INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

e criminal activity of Little Dick Handler/JEF for 7 years now. Mr Handler/ JEF should have been prosecuted by the same entities now prosecuting Mr Kamensky LONG ago. Cheers! Christopher J Dilorio Whistleblower From: Chris Dilorio < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:48 AM Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for prelimin

on of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY EFTA00094162 INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

e criminal activity of Little Dick Handler/JEF for 7 years now. Mr Handler/ JEF should have been prosecuted by the same entities now prosecuting Mr Kamensky LONG ago. Cheers! Christopher J Dilorio Whistleblower From: Chris Dilorio ‹ > Sent: Tuesda June 23 2020 9:48 AM Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for prelimina

makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

e criminal activity of Little Dick Handler/JEF for 7 years now. Mr Handler/ JEF should have been prosecuted by the same entities now prosecuting Mr Kamensky LONG ago. Cheers! Christopher J Dilorio Whistleblower From: Chris Dilorio Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:48 AM Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary

makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

e criminal activity of Little Dick Handler/JEF for 7 years now. Mr Handler/ JEF should have been prosecuted by the same entities now prosecuting Mr Kamensky LONG ago. Cheers! Christopher J Dilorio Whistleblower From: Chris Dilorio Sent: Tuesday. June 23.2020 9:48 AM EFTA00089576 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal