Epstein Secrets

on of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY EFTA00094162 INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

ower From: Chris Dilorio < EFTA00094160 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Ms Strauss, Mr Berger et al, Your prosecution of Mr Kamensky while obstructing an investigation of Little Dick Handler/JEF et al in the massive and very much

makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

•tember 5 2020 7:08 AM To EFTA00070669 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Ms Strauss, Mr Berger et al, Your prosecution of Mr Kamensky while obstructing an investigation of Little Dick Handler/JEF et al in the massive and very much

makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

endix_3-20_13_penultimate.docx; KCG_TCR_3-20-13-penultimate_draft.pdf; KCG_TCR_3-20-13-penultimate_draft.docx; KCG_Appendix_3-20_13_penultimate.pdf Ms Strauss, Mr Berger et al, Your prosecution of Mr Kamensky while obstructing an investigation of Little Dick Handler/JEF et al in the massive and very much