Epstein Secrets

makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

ight Capital TCR & Appendix From: Chris Dilorio Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 8:03 AM u je : w: orma appea or preliminarydenial covere ac ion - Knight Capi a ppendix The SMOKING GUN in my allegations: Naked shorting in CGFIA (My TCR/FINRA complaint) by "un named third party BD" in 2013. Well known to

n their Preliminary Determination Opco Award Denial for " Investigators never saw my information". Yet, SEC actions based on my information include: Hanover/Magna, JMJ/Keener, Fife, Southridge/Hicks, Opco, and UBSS. Missing somehow: NITE, Handler/Jefferies, Blackstone/Schwarzman etc etc. The last overt act of

Chris From: Chris Dilorio < Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 5:57 AM To Su je : w: orma appea ordenial covere ac ion - Knight Capi a ppen ix so sorry for incorrect e mail From: Chris Dilorio < Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 5:44 AM Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for denial cover

makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

istopher J Dilorio Whistleblower From: Chris Dilorio Sent: Tuesda June 23 2020 4:11 PM u j : w: orma appea or preliminarydenial covere ac ion - Knight Capi a ppen ix small typos/corrections: Mirror trade activity peaked in 1H2014 not 2H2014 and this coincides with OTCM astronomical share volume data