Epstein Secrets

sons, the Court should deny all twelve of the defendant's pre-trial motions. Dated: New York, New York February 26, 2021 Respectfully submitted, AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney By: Is Assistant United States Attorneys 212 EFTA00103237

se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required `only where the charges of the indictment are

sons, the Court should deny all twelve of the defendant's pre-trial motions. Dated: New York, New York February 26, 2021 Respectfully submitted, AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney By: /s Assistant United States Attorneys (212) 637-2225 212 EFTA00100179

se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required `only where the charges of the indictment are

sons, the Court should deny all twelve of the defendant's pre-trial motions. Dated: New York, New York February 26, 2021 Respectfully submitted, AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney By: Is Assistant United States Attorneys (212) 637-2225 212 EFTA00077844

se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required 'only where the charges of the indictment are

sons, the Court should deny all twelve of the defendant's pre-trial motions. Dated: New York, New York February 26, 2021 Respectfully submitted, AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney By: Is Assistant United States Attorneys (212) 637-2225 212 EFTA00039659

se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required 'only where the charges of the indictment are