Epstein Secrets

of contrary congressional intent, . . . compelled to conclude that Congress provided precisely the remedies it considered appropriate."') (quoting Karahalios, 489 U.S. at 533). Moreover, the additional civil remedies that Petitioners seek to engraft onto the CVRA are not recognized remedies within the cr

eding, and the right to 26 EFTA00205649 confer with the government's attorney, but is silent as to documents offered during the trial. See In re Slier, 571 F.3d at 609-10. Petitioners' belief that they are entitled to grand jury records also fails. The traditional rule of grand jury secrecy may be

a of contrary congressional intent, . . . compelled to conclude that Congress provided precisely the remedies it considered appropriate.") (quoting Karahalios, 489 U.S. at 533). Because Petitioners seek remedies not authorized by the CVRA's plain language, their requests should be denied. What's more, th

8 F.3d 1308, 1317 (10th Cir. 2008) (holding "that the CVRA does not provide 'victims' with a right of access to the government's files"); cf. In re Slier, 571 F.3d 604, 609 (6th Cir. 2009) (holding that "the CVRA does not provide an independent right to obtain PSRs"); Kenna v. United States, 453 F.3d

48 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th Cir. 2008) (declining to "to read additional remedies" into the CVRA beyond those expressly contained in the Act); see also Karahalios v. Nat'l Fed 'n of Fed. Employees, 489 U.S. 527, 533 (1989) ("[I]t is . . . an `elemental canon' of statutory construction that where a statute exp

on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 28 of 101 confer with the government's attorney, but is silent as to documents offered during the trial. See In re Slier, 571 F.3d at 609-10. Petitioners' belief that they are entitled to grand jury records also fails. The traditional rule of grand jury secrecy may be

SD Docket 06/24/2019 Page 11 of 32 (declining to "to read additional remedies" into the CVRA beyond those expressly contained in the Act); see also Karahalios v. Nat'l Fed'n of Fed. Employees, 489 U.S. 527, 533 (1989) ("[I]t is . . . an 'elemental canon of statutory construction that where a statute expre

be heard at a proceeding, and the right to confer with the government's attorney, but is silent as to documents offered during the trial. See In re Slier, 571 F.3d at 609-10. Petitioners argument that they are entitled to grand jury records similarly fails. The traditional rule of grand jury secrecy