Epstein Secrets

n case the investigation remains ongoing and the order needs to be renewed. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. By: Very truly yours, GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney ssistant nite States Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00102639 POSSIBLE AND VIA EMAIL. Grand Jury Subpoena P

s an "'appendage of the court" and it "depend[s] on the judiciary in its role as an investigative body." United States v. Seals, 130 F.3d 451, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (quoting Brown v. United States, 359 U.S. 41, 49 (1959)). As relevant here, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has

ion of its Facts section to discussing the prosecution of Epstein himself, that of course cannot justify withholding under Exemption 7(A), as Judge Berman entered an order of tiolle prosequi against Epstein on August 29, 2019 (Capone Dec1.1 8.) 10 EFTA00071639 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Fil

the Air Force, 566 F.2d 242 (1977) 6 Meyer v. Bush, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13626 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 1991), rev'd on other grounds, 981 F.2d 1288 (D.C. Cir. 1993) 7 Morley v. C.I.A., 508 F.3d 1108 (D.C. Cir. 2007) 14 Multi Ag Media LLC v. Dep't ofAgric., 515 F.3d 1224 (D.C. Cir. 2008) 14 N.Y. Tim

ion of its Facts section to discussing the prosecution of Epstein himself, that of course cannot justify withholding under Exemption 7(A), as Judge Berman entered an order of tiolle prosequi against Epstein on August 29, 2019 (Capone Dec1.1 8.) 10 EFTA00088716 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Fil

the Air Force, 566 F.2d 242 (1977) 6 Meyer v. Bush, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13626 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 1991), rev'd on other grounds, 981 F.2d 1288 (D.C. Cir. 1993) 7 Morley v. C.I.A., 508 F.3d 1108 (D.C. Cir. 2007) 14 Multi Ag Media LLC v. Dep't ofAgric., 515 F.3d 1224 (D.C. Cir. 2008) 14 N.Y. Tim