Epstein Secrets

ht be caused by the extradition65 should outweigh the public "Ahmad v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR SE6, para. 105. 60 R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2007] QB 727, para. 100. 61 Extradition Act 2003, s. 81. 62 Extradition Act 2003, s. 82. The date range for the offences in the superseding indict

four weeks to consider any representations from the requested person before ordering extradition: section 93(7) Removal 28 days of the order for extradition9 Cases where there is an extradition hearing The date of the extradition hearing (provisional arrest) Two months from the date on which the Secreta

ht be caused by the extradition65 should outweigh the public "Ahmad v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR SE6, para. 105. 60 R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2007] QB 727, para. 100. 61 Extradition Act 2003, s. 81. 62 Extradition Act 2003, s. 82. The date range for the offences in the superseding indict

four weeks to consider any representations from the requested person before ordering extradition: section 93(7) Removal 28 days of the order for extradition9 Cases where there is an extradition hearing The date of the extradition hearing (provisional arrest) Two months from the date on which the Secreta

ht be caused by the extradition65 should outweigh the public "Ahmad v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR SE6, para. 105. 60 R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2007] QB 727, para. 100. 61 Extradition Act 2003, s. 81. 62 Extradition Act 2003, s. 82. The date range for the offences in the superseding indict

four weeks to consider any representations from the requested person before ordering extradition: section 93(7) Removal 28 days of the order for extradition9 Cases where there is an extradition hearing The date of the extradition hearing (provisional arrest) Two months from the date on which the Secreta