Epstein Secrets

involves a request for an investigation of a former Assistant U.S. Attorney who filed a false statement in a Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) case in the Southern District of Florida. The recognized victims in that CVRA case — Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 — through undersigned legal counsel ( M) requested a criminal inv

ropriate disciplinary authorities. See Florida Rule Prof. Conduct, Rule 4-8.3 ("A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropria

absent leave of the Court to file the document or portion thereof under seal in accordance with Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. DE 247 at 1-2. The alleged "Confidential Discovery Material" included the same correspondence that was at issue in DE 188. See DE 247,

s from Epstein's defense attorneys discussing the case as well. The statements made by both victims counsel and defense counsel are proper, because the Rules of Professional Conduct plainly allow discussion with the media about "information contained in a public record." ABA R. Prof. Conduct 3.6(a)(2). Epstein also complains ab

m Beach Police Department, the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (the "USAO"), Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in June 2008, entered pleas of "guilty" in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach Count,

rom Mr. Robert Critton is attached hereto as Exhibit D). Defendant's counsel then sent a letter on May 21, 2009 citing the Comment to Rule 4-4.2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct that states that "(pJarties to a matter S Podhtnst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagkx Street, suite aeo, Maud, El. 33130, Miami Fax • Fat Lauderdale E