Epstein Secrets

45(c) (3)(A)(iii), for an order quashing subpoenas issued by counsel for the plaintiff in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida entitled Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein (08 Civ. 80893 KAM), in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages arising out of the defendant's

ngs, all emails to and from Jeffrey Edward Epstein or someone representing themselves to be Jeffrey Epstein," and the testimony of George Rush and Anne B. Carroll, a Vice President and General Counsel of Daily News, L.P. (Carroll Decl., Apr. 7, 2010, Exs. A & B.) In the alternative, the subpoenaed parties se

45(c) (3)(A)(iii), for an order quashing subpoenas issued by counsel for the plaintiff in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida entitled Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein (08 Civ. 80893 KAM), in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages arising out of the defendant's

ngs, all emails to and from Jeffrey Edward Epstein or someone representing themselves to be Jeffrey Epstein," and the testimony of George Rush and Anne B. Carroll, a Vice President and General Counsel of Daily News, IIII (Carroll Decl., Apr. 7, 2010, Exs. A & B.) In the alternative, the subpoenaed parties se

5(c) (3)(A) (iii), for an order quashing subpoenas issued by counsel for the plaintiff in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida entitled Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein (08 Civ. 80893 KAM), in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages arising out of the defendant's

ngs, all emails to and from Jeffrey Edward Epstein or someone representing themselves to be Jeffrey Epstein," and the testimony of George Rush and Anne B. Carroll, a Vice President and General Counsel of Daily News, L.P. (Carroll Decl., Apr. 7, 2010, Exs. A & B.) In the alternative, the subpoenaed parties see

)(3)(A)(iii) quashing subpoenas for an evidentiary hearing served on them by plaintiff in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida captioned Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-cv-80893-KAM, based on the qualified reporter's privilege accorded by the First Amendment

RUSH x No. 10 M8-85 (LLM) NOTICE OF MOTION COUNSELORS: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the annexed reply memorandum of law, Reply Declaration of Anne B. Carroll, and Supplementary Affidavit of George Rush, Daily News, L.P., and Daily News Journalist George Rush will move this Court in the Part One of the Uni

f. Ex. M (Memorandum & Order dated May 18, 2010 ("Dist. Ct. Op.")), at 1. Thereafter, the Daily News and Rush instituted an ancillary proceeding in the Southern District of New York to quash the subpoenas on the ground (among others) that Jane Doe could not overcome the federal reporter's privilege. In opposition to

Robert D. Balin Victor Hendrickson 1633 Broadway — 27th Floor New York, NY 10019 Tel: (212) 489-8230 Attorneys for Daily News,.. Of Counsel: Anne B. Carroll Deputy General Counsel Daily News, 450 West 33rd Street New York, NY 10019 Tel: (212) 210-2341 922 A.2d at 1275 (2007) (noting in dicta that no